Holocene palaeohydrology of the East Alligator River, for application to mine site rehabilitation, Northern Australia

2020 ◽  
Vol 249 ◽  
pp. 106552
Author(s):  
Mike Saynor ◽  
Robert Wasson ◽  
Wayne Erskine ◽  
Daryl Lam
Soil Research ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth G. Evans

Erosion of rehabilitated mines may result in landform instability, which in turn may result in exposure of encapsulated contaminants, elevated sediment delivery at catchment outlets, and subsequent degradation of downstream water quality. Rehabilitation design can be assessed using erosion and hydrology models calibrated to mine site conditions. Incision rates in containment structures can be quantified using 3-dimensional landform evolution simulation techniques. Sediment delivery at catchment outlets for various landform amelioration techniques can be predicted using process-based and empirical erosion-prediction models and sediment delivery ratios. The predicted sediment delivery can be used to estimate an average annual stream sediment load that can, in turn, be used to assess water quality impacts. Application of these techniques is demonstrated through a case study applied to a proposed rehabilitation design option for the Energy Resources of Australia Ltd (ERA) Ranger Mine in the Northern Territory of Australia.


Spoil to Soil ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 203-213
Author(s):  
Ramesh Thangavel ◽  
Rajasekar Karunanithi ◽  
Hasintha Wijesekara ◽  
Yubo Yan ◽  
Balaji Seshadri ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Paula Alvarenga ◽  
Rafael Clemente ◽  
Carlos Garbisu ◽  
José M. Becerril

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (21) ◽  
pp. 3535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip B. McKenna ◽  
Alex M. Lechner ◽  
Stuart Phinn ◽  
Peter D. Erskine

The mining industry has been operating across the globe for millennia, but it is only in the last 50 years that remote sensing technology has enabled the visualization, mapping and assessment of mining impacts and landscape recovery. Our review of published literature (1970–2019) found that the number of ecologically focused remote sensing studies conducted on mine site rehabilitation increased gradually, with the greatest proportion of studies published in the 2010–2019 period. Early studies were driven exclusively by Landsat sensors at the regional and landscape scales while in the last decade, multiple earth observation and drone-based sensors across a diverse range of study locations contributed to our increased understanding of vegetation development post-mining. The Normalized Differenced Vegetation Index (NDVI) was the most common index, and was used in 45% of papers; while research that employed image classification techniques typically used supervised (48%) and manual interpretation methods (37%). Of the 37 publications that conducted error assessments, the average overall mapping accuracy was 84%. In the last decade, new classification methods such as Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) have emerged (10% of studies within the last ten years), along with new platforms and sensors such as drones (15% of studies within the last ten years) and high spatial and/or temporal resolution earth observation satellites. We used the monitoring standards recommended by the International Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) to determine the ecological attributes measured by each study. Most studies (63%) focused on land cover mapping (spatial mosaic); while comparatively fewer studies addressed complex topics such as ecosystem function and resilience, species composition, and absence of threats, which are commonly the focus of field-based rehabilitation monitoring. We propose a new research agenda based on identified knowledge gaps and the ecological monitoring tool recommended by SER, to ensure that future remote sensing approaches are conducted with a greater focus on ecological perspectives, i.e., in terms of final targets and end land-use goals. In particular, given the key rehabilitation requirement of self-sustainability, the demonstration of ecosystem resilience to disturbance and climate change should be a key area for future research.


Author(s):  
Palaniswamy Thangavel ◽  
Ganapathi Sridevi ◽  
Palanisamy Vasudhevan ◽  
Sri Ramaraju Guvvala

Author(s):  
Adarsh Kumar ◽  
Tripti ◽  
Majeti N.V. Prasad ◽  
Subodh K. Maiti ◽  
Paulo J.C. Favas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document