Emergent listener responses following intraverbal training in children with autism

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 654-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Einar T. Ingvarsson ◽  
Anthony P. Cammilleri ◽  
Heather Macias
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-482
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Lee ◽  
Hyesuk LeePark ◽  
Seungju Kim ◽  
Mi‐seong Park ◽  
Soohyun Park

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Douglas Greer ◽  
Mapy Chavez-Brown ◽  
Anjalee S. Nirgudkar ◽  
Lauren Stolfi ◽  
Celestina Rivera-Valdes

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Kodak ◽  
Rashea Fuchtman ◽  
Amber Paden

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 3265-3275
Author(s):  
Heather L. Ramsdell-Hudock ◽  
Anne S. Warlaumont ◽  
Lindsey E. Foss ◽  
Candice Perry

Purpose To better enable communication among researchers, clinicians, and caregivers, we aimed to assess how untrained listeners classify early infant vocalization types in comparison to terms currently used by researchers and clinicians. Method Listeners were caregivers with no prior formal education in speech and language development. A 1st group of listeners reported on clinician/researcher-classified vowel, squeal, growl, raspberry, whisper, laugh, and cry vocalizations obtained from archived video/audio recordings of 10 infants from 4 through 12 months of age. A list of commonly used terms was generated based on listener responses and the standard research terminology. A 2nd group of listeners was presented with the same vocalizations and asked to select terms from the list that they thought best described the sounds. Results Classifications of the vocalizations by listeners largely overlapped with published categorical descriptors and yielded additional insight into alternate terms commonly used. The biggest discrepancies were found for the vowel category. Conclusion Prior research has shown that caregivers are accurate in identifying canonical babbling, a major prelinguistic vocalization milestone occurring at about 6–7 months of age. This indicates that caregivers are also well attuned to even earlier emerging vocalization types. This supports the value of continuing basic and clinical research on the vocal types infants produce in the 1st months of life and on their potential diagnostic utility, and may also help improve communication between speech-language pathologists and families.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document