scholarly journals Influences on the psychosocial adjustment of siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder in Taiwan and the United Kingdom

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 115-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsiao-Wei Joy Tsai ◽  
Katie Cebula ◽  
Sue Fletcher-Watson
Autism ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1557-1565
Author(s):  
Mariko Hosozawa ◽  
Amanda Sacker ◽  
William Mandy ◽  
Emily Midouhas ◽  
Eirini Flouri ◽  
...  

This study aimed to identify determinants of a late autism spectrum disorder diagnosis, including diagnoses made ‘very late’ (i.e., in adolescence), using the Millennium Cohort Study, a nationally representative population-based cohort in the United Kingdom. Children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder by age 14 (N = 581) were included and grouped by the parent-reported timing of diagnosis: before school (up to age 5), during primary school (age 5–11) and during secondary school (age 11–14). Predictors of diagnostic timing, at the child, family and school levels, were investigated using multinomial logistic regression. Most (79%) children with autism spectrum disorder were diagnosed after school entry, and 28% were not diagnosed until secondary school. Among those not diagnosed until secondary school, 75% had been identified at age 5 years by a parent and/or teacher as having socio-behavioural difficulties. Being diagnosed after starting school was predicted by living in poverty (adjusted relative risk ratio: primary = 1.90, 95% confidence interval: 1.03–3.53; secondary = 2.15, 1.05–4.42) and/or having no initial parental concerns (primary = 0.32, 0.15–0.70; secondary = 0.19, 0.09–0.43). Having typical-range intelligence also predicted diagnosis during secondary school. The result indicates that those without cognitive delays and poorer children were at risk of ‘very late’ (i.e. adolescent) diagnosis. Strategies to promote earlier identification, targeting age at primary school entry, could help those more likely to be diagnosed late. Lay abstract Despite policy emphasis on early identification, many children with autism spectrum disorder are diagnosed late, with some being diagnosed as late as in adolescence. However, evidence on what determines the timing of autism spectrum disorder diagnosis including children diagnosed in adolescence is lacking. Understanding these determinants, particularly in those diagnosed later than is ideal, can inform the development of effective strategies to improve earlier identification of autism spectrum disorder. This study used a nationally representative population-based cohort in the United Kingdom to explore child, family and school level predictors of timing of autism spectrum disorder diagnosis. In the United Kingdom, 79% of the children with autism spectrum disorder were diagnosed after entering primary school and 28% during secondary school. Among those not diagnosed until secondary school, 75% had shown social difficulties noticed by parents and/or teachers at age 5 years. The results suggest that healthcare providers should be aware that, even for universal systems of care, those living in poverty and having higher intelligence are most likely to miss out on a timely diagnosis. Strategies to promote earlier identification among school-aged children, including targeting primary school entry age (i.e. around age 5) and that encouraging referrals for a formal assessment at the first report of concerns over the child’s social development may benefit those children who would otherwise be diagnosed later.


Autism ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 820-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire L Rogers ◽  
Lorna Goddard ◽  
Elisabeth L Hill ◽  
Lucy A Henry ◽  
Laura Crane

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 3033-3044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Jones ◽  
Lorna Goddard ◽  
Elisabeth L. Hill ◽  
Lucy A. Henry ◽  
Laura Crane

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 586-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaitlyn A. Clarke ◽  
Diane L. Williams

Purpose The aim of this research study was to examine common practices of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who work with children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with respect to whether or not SLPs consider processing differences in ASD or the effects of input during their instruction. Method Following a qualitative research method, how SLPs instruct and present augmentative and alternative communication systems to individuals with ASD, their rationale for method selection, and their perception of the efficacy of selected interventions were probed. Semistructured interviews were conducted as part of an in-depth case report with content analysis. Results Based on completed interviews, 4 primary themes were identified: (a) instructional method , (b) input provided , (c) decision-making process , and (d) perceived efficacy of treatment . Additionally, one secondary theme, training and education received , was identified . Conclusions Clinicians reported making decisions based on the needs of the child; however, they also reported making decisions based on the diagnostic category that characterized the child (i.e., ASD). The use of modeling when teaching augmentative and alternative communication to individuals with ASD emerged as a theme, but variations in the method of modeling were noted. SLPs did not report regularly considering processing differences in ASD, nor did they consider the effects of input during instruction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document