scholarly journals Evaluating interdisciplinary care coordination and team functioning in inpatient rehabilitation to improve patient outcomes: Recent findings from a multiyear quality improvement project

2018 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. e505-e506
Author(s):  
D. Strasser ◽  
E. Preston-Hsu ◽  
A. Backscheider Burridge ◽  
S. Penna
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan Carides

Ambulation is the single most important nursing intervention in the prevention of postoperative complications. It is also a key component in maintaining optimal patient outcomes. Current literature has revealed that when ambulation is initiated early there is a marked decrease in pain, length of hospital admission, and overall complication rates. However, even with this depth of evidence early postoperative ambulation on the two surgical units at a teaching hospital in Rhode Island, patient ambulation continues to be inconsistent. The purpose of this quality improvement project is to improve nursing knowledge regarding early ambulation after surgery for the prevention of post-operative complications. This project utilized a pretest, educational in-service intervention, and posttest design. Seventeen out of a possible 22 surgical nurses participated in this project (N= 17, 77%). The educational in-service sessions combined information from an extensive literature review in the form of a 10-minute Power Point presentation. Pre and post tests were made up of 5 knowledge-based and 5 opinion-based questions. The mean scores for the pretest were 74% while the mean scores for the posttest were 95.2%. There was a 35% increase in overall scores following the educational intervention. APRNs play a pivotal role in establishing and implementing educational programs. This project aimed to recognize a need for ongoing education about postoperative ambulation for the surgical unit nurses. Educational programs about postoperative ambulation and complication prevention should be routinely incorporated in future trainings to ensure improved nursing knowledge and patient outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 939-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soffien Chadli Ajmi ◽  
Rajiv Advani ◽  
Lars Fjetland ◽  
Kathinka Dehli Kurz ◽  
Thomas Lindner ◽  
...  

BackgroundIn eligible patients with acute ischaemic stroke, rapid revascularisation is crucial for good outcome. At our treatment centre, we had achieved and sustained a median door-to-needle time of under 30 min. We hypothesised that further improvement could be achieved through implementing a revised treatment protocol and in situ simulation-based team training sessions. This report describes a quality improvement project aiming to reduce door-to-needle times in stroke thrombolysis.MethodsAll members of the acute stroke treatment team were surveyed to tailor the interventions to local conditions. Through a review of responses and available literature, the improvement team suggested changes to streamline the protocol and designed in situ simulation-based team training sessions. Implementation of interventions started in February 2017. We completed 14 simulation sessions from February to June 2017 and an additional 12 sessions from November 2017 to March 2018. Applying Kirkpatrick’s four-level training evaluation model, participant reactions, clinical behaviour and patient outcomes were measured. Statistical process control charts were used to demonstrate changes in treatment times and patient outcomes.ResultsA total of 650 consecutive patients, including a 3-year baseline, treated with intravenous thrombolysis were assessed. Median door to needle times were significantly reduced from 27 to 13 min and remained consistent after 13 months. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts indicate a reduced proportion of patients deceased or bedridden after 90 days. There was no significant change in balancing measures (stroke mimics, fatal intracranial haemorrhage and prehospital times).ConclusionsImplementing a revised treatment protocol in combination with in situ simulation-based team training sessions for stroke thrombolysis was followed by a considerable reduction in door-to-needle times and improved patient outcomes. Additional work is needed to assess sustainability and generalisability of the interventions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 915-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith A. Vessey ◽  
Jennifer McCrave ◽  
Catherine Curro-Harrington ◽  
Rachel L. DiFazio

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  

Pain is the most commonly presented symptom among patients who are admitted to the emergency department. Unfortunately, many barriers to pain management exist thereby impacting emergency department patient care and outcomes, specifically regarding inadequate pain assessment, reassessment, and documentation. Thus, the quality improvement project aimed to increase emergency department nurses knowledge of pain management and utilization of pain assessment guidelines, resources, and policies. By nurses having sufficient education, they can provide timely and efficient care to support patient outcomes, improve patient comfort, and improve patient satisfaction. The Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain was utilized to conduct a pre and post-test assessment to measure emergency department nurses’ knowledge of pain management [1]. The results of the quality improvement project showed that nurses lacked adequate pain management knowledge, 45.45% of participants responded incorrectly to knowledge questions about pain before the intervention. However, after the project implementation, the results of the data analysis showed a statistically significant mean increase of 23.91% from pre-intervention (65.65%) to post-intervention (89.56%) after eight weeks of project implementation. This quality improvement project will provide a basis for future studies in improving nurses’ pain management knowledge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document