Quality of chest compressions, perceived fatigue and energy expenditure with compression:ventilation ratios of 15:1, 30:2 or continuous chest-compression single-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A manikin study

Resuscitation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. S48-S49
Author(s):  
Y.M. Kim ◽  
H.J. Baek ◽  
S.H. Kim ◽  
H.J. Kim ◽  
J.H. Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Manikin Study

Abstract 17534: The Most Appropriate Number of Personnel Needed for Chest Compressions for In-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Yamanaka ◽  
Kei Nishiyama ◽  
Hiroyuki Hayashi ◽  
Ji Young Huh
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Preliminary Evaluation ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Rescue Team ◽  
Manikin Study ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Effective chest compression (CC) is vital in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and rescuer’s fatigue negatively affects quality of CPR. However, there is no consensus on the appropriate number of personnel needed for CC to avoid rescuer’s fatigue. Objective: We determined the appropriate number of personnel needed for 30-min CPR in a rescue-team in a hospital. Methods: We conducted a preliminary randomized, crossover, manikin trial on healthcare providers. We divided them into Groups A to D according to the intervals between the 2-min CC and assigned a different interval to each group. Groups A, B, C, and D performed CCs at 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-min intervals as in 2, 3, 4, and 5 personnel, respectively. All participants performed CCs for 30 min with different intervals depending on the assigned group; participants allocated to Groups A, B, C, and D performed 8, 5, 4, and 3 cycles, respectively. We compared the differences between first cycle and the second to the last cycle Results: We enrolled 42 participants (age: 25.2±4.2, men 47.6%) for the preliminary evaluation. We used Kruskal-Wallis for the analysis. Participants in the less interval Groups A and B performed faster (A: -24.28±15.18, B: -7.90±13.49, C: -11.27±17.01, D: -2.38±3.31, P=0.03) and shallower CCs (A: -4.42±6.92, B: -3.18±5.43, C: -0.18±5.74, D: -1.23±4.10, P=0.62). Women-rescuers performed faster (A: -27.25±12.23, B: -7.00±13.97, C: -8.16±19.26, D: 3.16±4.66, P= 0.05) and shallower CCs (A: -6.25±7.54, B: -3.00±6.89, C: -3.66±3.32, D: -0.16±4.35, P=0.58). However, CCs of men-rescuers were not faster (A: -20.33±20.65, B: -9.00±14.44, C: -15.00±15.11, D: -7.14±16.70, P= 0.60) or shallower (A: -2.00±6.55 B: -3.40±3.78, C: 4.00±5.33, D: -2.14±3.98, P=0.06). Conclusion: At least four rescuers (Group C) may be needed to reduce rescuer’s fatigue for 30-min CPR. If the team only includes women, more personnel would be needed as women experience fatigue faster.

scholarly journals An alternative method of chest compression from over-the-head during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczyslaw Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Respiration ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Confined Spaces ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Emergency Interventions ◽  
The Subject

Abstract Background Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial respiration using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side, with compression carried out from behind the patient’s head. Methods The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial respiration after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compression and respiration were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. The average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p<0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p<0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p<0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p<0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p<0.001). The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions The demonstrated higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method conducted by one person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions than only for CPR conducted in confined spaces.

scholarly journals Comparison of standard and over-the-head method of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczysław Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Ventilation ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Confined Spaces ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Interventions

Abstract Background: Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial ventilation using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side with compression conducted from the ‘over-the-head’ position. Methods: The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of cycles of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial ventilation after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compression and ventilation were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results: Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data collected, giving the following results: the average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p < 0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p < 0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p < 0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p < 0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the results to the benefit of the OTH method in the above parameters. The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions: The demonstrated higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method conducted by one person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions than only for CPR conducted in confined spaces.

scholarly journals Can the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improve the performance of chest compressions during bystander resuscitation: A randomised crossover manikin study

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgette Eaton ◽  
John Renshaw ◽  
Pete Gregory ◽  
Tim Kilner
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
British Heart Foundation ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Manikin Study ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Heart Foundation

This study aims to determine whether the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR training application can improve the depth and rate of chest compression and therefore be confidently recommended for bystander use. A total of 118 candidates were recruited into a randomised crossover manikin trial. Each candidate performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 2 min without instruction or performed chest compressions using the PocketCPR application. Candidates then performed a further 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the opposite arm. The number of chest compressions performed improved when PocketCPR was used compared to chest compressions when it was not (44.28% vs 40.57%, p < 0.001). The number of chest compressions performed to the required depth was higher in the PocketCPR group (90.86 vs 66.26). The British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improved the percentage of chest compressions that were performed to the required depth. Despite this, more work is required in order to develop a feedback device that can improve bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation without creating delay.

scholarly journals Comparison of standard and over-the-head method of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczysław Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Ventilation ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Single Person ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Interventions

Abstract Background: Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial ventilation using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side with compression conducted from the ‘over-the-head’ position. Methods: The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of cycles of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial ventilation after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compressions and ventilations were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results: Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data collected, giving the following results: the average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p < 0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p < 0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p < 0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p < 0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the results to the benefit of the OTH method in the above parameters. The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions: The higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method by a single person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions.

scholarly journals Comparison of standard and over-the-head method of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczysław Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Ventilation ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Single Person ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Interventions

Abstract Background Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial ventilation using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side with compression conducted from the ‘over-the-head’ position. Methods The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of cycles of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial ventilation after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compressions and ventilations were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data collected, giving the following results: the average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p < 0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p < 0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p < 0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p < 0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the results to the benefit of the OTH method in the above parameters. The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions The higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method by a single person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions.

scholarly journals The impact of chest compression rates on quality of chest compressions – A manikin study

Resuscitation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 360-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Field ◽  
Jasmeet Soar ◽  
Robin P. Davies ◽  
Naheed Akhtar ◽  
Gavin D. Perkins
Keyword(s):  
Chest Compression ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Manikin Study ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Comparison of standard and over-the-head method of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczysław Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Ventilation ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Single Person ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Interventions

Abstract Background: Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial ventilation using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side with compression conducted from the ‘over-the-head’ position. Methods: The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of cycles of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial ventilation after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compressions and ventilations were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results: Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data collected, giving the following results: the average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p < 0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p < 0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p < 0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p < 0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the results to the benefit of the OTH method in the above parameters. The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions: The higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method by a single person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document