scholarly journals Comparison of standard and over-the-head method of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczysław Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Ventilation ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Single Person ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Interventions

Abstract Background: Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial ventilation using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side with compression conducted from the ‘over-the-head’ position. Methods: The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of cycles of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial ventilation after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compressions and ventilations were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results: Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data collected, giving the following results: the average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p < 0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p < 0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p < 0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p < 0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the results to the benefit of the OTH method in the above parameters. The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions: The higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method by a single person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions.

scholarly journals Comparison of standard and over-the-head method of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczysław Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Ventilation ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Single Person ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Interventions

Abstract Background Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial ventilation using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side with compression conducted from the ‘over-the-head’ position. Methods The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of cycles of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial ventilation after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compressions and ventilations were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data collected, giving the following results: the average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p < 0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p < 0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p < 0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p < 0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the results to the benefit of the OTH method in the above parameters. The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions The higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method by a single person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions.

scholarly journals Comparison of standard and over-the-head method of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczysław Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Ventilation ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Single Person ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Interventions

Abstract Background: Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial ventilation using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side with compression conducted from the ‘over-the-head’ position. Methods: The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of cycles of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial ventilation after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compressions and ventilations were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results: Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data collected, giving the following results: the average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p < 0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p < 0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p < 0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p < 0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the results to the benefit of the OTH method in the above parameters. The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions: The higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method by a single person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions.

scholarly journals Comparison of standard and over-the-head method of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczysław Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Ventilation ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Confined Spaces ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Interventions

Abstract Background: Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial ventilation using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side with compression conducted from the ‘over-the-head’ position. Methods: The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of cycles of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial ventilation after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compression and ventilation were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results: Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data collected, giving the following results: the average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p < 0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p < 0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p < 0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p < 0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the results to the benefit of the OTH method in the above parameters. The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions: The demonstrated higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method conducted by one person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions than only for CPR conducted in confined spaces.

scholarly journals An alternative method of chest compression from over-the-head during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczyslaw Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Respiration ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Confined Spaces ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Emergency Interventions ◽  
The Subject

Abstract Background Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial respiration using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side, with compression carried out from behind the patient’s head. Methods The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial respiration after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compression and respiration were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. The average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p<0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p<0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p<0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p<0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p<0.001). The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions The demonstrated higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method conducted by one person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions than only for CPR conducted in confined spaces.

Role of Dominant Hand Position during Chest Compression by Novice Rescuers: An Observational Simulation Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 382-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch Jo ◽  
Jh Ahn ◽  
Yd Shon ◽  
Gc Cho
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Simulation Study ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Dominant Hand ◽  
Cpr Training

Introduction The aim of this study was to determine the effect of hand positioning on the quality of external chest compression (ECC) by novice rescuers. Methods This observational simulation study was conducted for 117 included participants. After completion of an adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training program for 3-h, the participants selected which of their hands would be in contact with the mannequin during ECC and performed 5 cycles of single rescuer CPR on a recording mannequin. The participants were assigned to 2 groups: the dominant hand group (DH; n=40) and the non-dominant hand group (NH; n=29). The depth and rate of ECC were analysed to compare the effectiveness of ECC between 2 groups. Results The rate of ECC was significantly faster in the DH group (mean, 117.3 ±11.4/min) than in the NH group (mean, 110.9±12.2/min) (p=0.028). However, the depth of ECC in the dominant hand group (mean, 52.4±5.9 mm) was not significantly different from that in the non-dominant hand group (mean, 50.8±6.0 mm) (p=0.287). Similarly, the portion of ECC with inadequate depth in the dominant hand group (mean, 1.8±4.3%) was not significantly different from that in the non-dominant hand group (mean, 5.3±15.6%) (p=0.252). Conclusions ECC can be performed with an acceptably higher rate of compressions when the dominant hand of the novice rescuer is placed in contact with the sternum. However, the position of the dominant hand does not affect the depth of ECC. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2014;21:382-386)

scholarly journals USING CHEST COMPRESSIONS WITH ASYNCHRONOUS VENTILATION AT VARIOUS CHEST COMPRESSION RATES (90, 100, 120/MIN) – A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED ANIMAL TRIAL

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. e27-e28
Author(s):  
Sparsh Patel ◽  
Po-Yin Cheung ◽  
Tze-Fun Lee ◽  
Matteo Pasquin ◽  
Megan O’Reilly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Porcine Model ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Neonatal Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Neonatal Asphyxia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Mean

Abstract BACKGROUND The current Pediatric Advanced Life Support guidelines recommends that newborns who require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in settings (e.g., prehospital, Emergency department, or paediatric intensive care unit, etc.) should receive continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations (CCaV) if an advanced airway is in place. However, this has never been examined in a newborn model of neonatal asphyxia. OBJECTIVES To determine if CCaV at rates of 90/min or 120/min compared to current standard of 100/min will reduce the time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in a porcine model of neonatal resuscitation. DESIGN/METHODS Term newborn piglets were anesthetized, intubated, instrumented, and exposed to 40-min normocapnic hypoxia followed by asphyxia, which was achieved by clamping the endotracheal tube until asystole. Piglets were randomized into 3 CCaV groups: chest compression (CC) at a rate of 90/min (CCaV 90,n=7), of 100/min (CCaV 100,n=7), of 120/min (CCaV 120,n=7), or sham-operated group. A two-step randomization process with sequentially numbered, sealed brown envelope was used to reduce selection bias. After surgical instrumentation and stabilization an envelope containing the allocation “sham” or “intervention” was opened (step one). The sham-operated group had the same surgical protocol, stabilization, and equivalent experimental periods without hypoxia and asphyxia. Only piglets randomized to “intervention” underwent hypoxia and asphyxia. Once the criteria for CPR were met, a second envelope containing the group allocations was opened (step two). Cardiac function, carotid blood flow, cerebral oxygenation, and respiratory parameters were continuously recorded throughout the experiment. RESULTS The mean (±SD) duration of asphyxia was similar between the groups with 260 (±133)sec, 336 (±217)sec, and 231 (±174)sec for CCav 90, CCaV 100, and CCaV 120, respectively (p=1.000; oneway ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test). The mean (SD) time to ROSC was also similar between groups 342 (±345)sec, 312 (±316)sec, and 309 (±287)sec for CCav 90, CCaV 100, and CCaV 120, respectively (p=1.000; oneway ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test). Overall, 5/7 in the CCaV 90, 5/7 in CCaV 100, and 5/7 in the CCaV 120 survived. CONCLUSION There was no significant difference in time to ROSC for either chest compression technique during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of neonatal asphyxia.

scholarly journals Two‐Thumb Technique Is Superior to Two‐Finger Technique in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Simulated Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Infants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giani Cioccari ◽  
Tais Sica da Rocha ◽  
Jefferson Pedro Piva
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Ventilatory Parameters ◽  
Barrier Device ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Off Time

Background To compare the 2‐finger and 2‐thumb chest compression techniques on infant manikins in an out‐of‐hospital setting regarding efficiency of compressions, ventilation, and rescuer pain and fatigue. Methods and Results In a randomized crossover design, 78 medical students performed 2 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with mouth‐to‐nose ventilation at a 30:2 rate on a Resusci Baby QCPR infant manikin (Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway), using a barrier device and the 2‐finger and 2‐thumb compression techniques. Frequency and depth of chest compressions, proper hand position, complete chest recoil at each compression, hands‐off time, tidal volume, and number of ventilations were evaluated through manikin‐embedded SkillReporting software. After the interventions, standard Likert questionnaires and analog scales for pain and fatigue were applied. The variables were compared by a paired t ‐test or Wilcoxon test as suitable. Seventy‐eight students participated in the study and performed 156 complete interventions. The 2‐thumb technique resulted in a greater depth of chest compressions (42 versus 39.7 mm; P <0.01), and a higher percentage of chest compressions with adequate depth (89.5% versus 77%; P <0.01). There were no differences in ventilatory parameters or hands‐off time between techniques. Pain and fatigue scores were higher for the 2‐finger technique (5.2 versus 1.8 and 3.8 versus 2.6, respectively; P <0.01). Conclusions In a simulation of out‐of‐hospital, single‐rescuer infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the 2‐thumb technique achieves better quality of chest compressions without interfering with ventilation and causes less rescuer pain and fatigue.

The Effect of Operator Position on the Quality of Chest Compressions Delivered in a Simulated Ambulance

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Scott Mullin ◽  
Sinéad Lydon ◽  
Paul O’Connor
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Standing Position ◽  
Compression Rate ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Safety Risks ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

AbstractBackground:Ambulances are where patient care is often initiated or maintained, but this setting poses safety risks for paramedics. Paramedics have found that in order to optimize patient care, they must compromise their own safety by standing unsecured in a moving ambulance.Hypothesis/Problem:This study sought to compare the quality of chest compressions in the two positions they can be delivered within an ambulance.Methods:A randomized, counterbalanced study was carried out with 24 paramedic students. Simulated chest compressions were performed in a stationary ambulance on a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) manikin for two minutes from either: (A) an unsecured standing position, or (B) a seated secured position. Participants’ attitudes toward the effectiveness of the two positions were evaluated.Results:The mean total number of chest compressions was not significantly different standing unsecured (220; SD = 12) as compared to seated and secured (224; SD = 21). There was no significant difference in mean compression rate standing unsecured (110 compressions per minute; SD = 6) as compared to seated and secured (113 compressions per minute; SD = 10). Chest compressions performed in the unsecured standing position yielded a significantly greater mean depth (52 mm; SD = 6) than did seated secured (26 mm; SD = 7; P < .001). Additionally, the standing unsecured position produced a significantly higher percentage (83%; SD = 21) for the number of correct compressions, as compared to the seated secured position (8%; SD = 17; P < .001). Participants also believed that chest compressions delivered when standing were more effective than those delivered when seated.Conclusions:The quality of chest compressions delivered from a seated and secured position is inferior to those delivered from an unsecured standing position. There is a need to consider how training, technologies, and ambulance design can impact the quality of chest compressions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document