Comparison of historical anatomic landmarks vs. ultrasound guidance for the selection of a needle insertion site for jugular central venous access

Resuscitation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. e113-e114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Galinski ◽  
Jean Catineau ◽  
Karim Tazarourte ◽  
Nicole Dardel ◽  
Philippe Bertrand ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Shane ◽  
Zahra Premji

Evidence from 2 clinical studies showed that there was no difference in the rates of infection and complications between peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion at the bedside and insertion in Interventional Radiology (IR) suites. However, each of these studies focused on small subgroups of the larger pediatric population and had other methodological limitations. Evidence from 1 clinical study in a single quaternary, non-cardiac, pediatric intensive care unit suggested that the median time from PICC line order to successful insertion was longer for lines placed in the IR compared to at the bedside. Two guidelines were identified that recommend ultrasound guidance for insertion of central venous access devices (CVAD), including PICCs: 1 was aimed at all pediatric patients and 1 was aimed at onco-hematological pediatric patients who had numerous quality limitations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 359-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen He ◽  
Rebecca Vieira ◽  
Jennifer R. Marin

1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 838-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigehito Sato ◽  
Ei Ueno ◽  
Hidenori Toyooka

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. A76
Author(s):  
Nisha Gandhi ◽  
John M Oropello ◽  
Francis Amede ◽  
Kush Patel ◽  
Anthony Manasia ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 87 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 420A
Author(s):  
S. Sato ◽  
E. Ueno ◽  
T. Suwa ◽  
H. Toyooka

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document