Predictors of favourable outcome after in-hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Resuscitation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 62-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia D’Arrigo ◽  
Sofia Cacciola ◽  
Mark Dennis ◽  
Christian Jung ◽  
Eisuke Kagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Favourable Outcome ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

scholarly journals Neurological outcome after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Gravesteijn ◽  
Marc Schluep ◽  
Maksud Disli ◽  
Prakriti Garkhail ◽  
Dinis Dos Reis Miranda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Favourable Outcome ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background: In hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major adverse event with a high mortality rate if not treated appropriately. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), as adjunct to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) is a promising technique for IHCA treatment. Evidence pertaining to neurological outcomes after ECPR is still scarce. Methods: We performed a comprehensive systematic search of all studies up to December 20th 2019. Our primary outcome was neurological outcome after ECPR at any moment after hospital discharge, defined by the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score. A score of 1 or 2 was defined as favourable outcome. Our secondary outcome was post-discharge mortality. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed. Results: Our search yielded 1215 results, of which 19 studies were included in this systematic review. The average survival rate was 30% (95% CI: 28-33%, I2=0%, p=0.24). In the surviving patients, the pooled percentage of favourable neurological outcome was 84% (95% CI: 80-88%, I2=24%, p=0.90). Conclusion: CPR as treatment for in-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with a large proportion of patients with good neurological outcome. The large proportion of favourable outcome could potentially be explained by the selection of patients for treatment using ECPR. Moreover, survival is higher than described in the conventional CPR literature. As indications for ECPR might extend to older or more fragile patient populations in the future, research should focus on increasing survival, while maintaining optimal neurological outcome.

scholarly journals Neurological outcome after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Gravesteijn ◽  
Marc Schluep ◽  
Maksud Disli ◽  
Prakriti Garkhail ◽  
Dinis Dos Reis Miranda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Favourable Outcome ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract BackgroundIn hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major adverse event with a high mortality rate if not treated appropriately. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), as adjunct to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) is a promising technique for IHCA treatment. Evidence pertaining to neurological outcomes after ECPR is still scarce. MethodsWe performed a comprehensive systematic search of all studies up to December 20th 2019. Our primary outcome was neurological outcome after ECPR at any moment after hospital discharge, defined by the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score. A score of 1 or 2 was defined as favourable outcome. Our secondary outcome was post-discharge mortality. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed. ResultsOur search yielded 1215 results, of which 19 studies were included in this systematic review. The average survival rate was 31% (95% CI: 28-33%, I2=0%, p=0.26). In the surviving patients, the pooled percentage of favourable neurological outcome was 83% (95% CI: 79-87%, I2=24%, p=0.75). ConclusionECPR as treatment for in-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with a large proportion of patients with good neurological outcome. The large proportion of favourable outcome could potentially be explained by the selection of patients for treatment using ECPR. Moreover, survival is higher than described in the conventional CPR literature. As indications for ECPR might extend to older or more fragile patient populations in the future, research should focus on increasing survival, while maintaining optimal neurological outcome.

scholarly journals Neurological outcome after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Gravesteijn ◽  
Marc Schluep ◽  
Maksud Disli ◽  
Prakriti Garkhail ◽  
Dinis Dos Reis Miranda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Favourable Outcome ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background In hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major adverse event with a high mortality rate if not treated appropriately. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), as adjunct to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) is a promising technique for IHCA treatment. Evidence pertaining to neurological outcomes after ECPR is still scarce. Methods We performed a comprehensive systematic search of all studies up to December 20 th 2019. Our primary outcome was neurological outcome after ECPR at any moment after hospital discharge, defined by the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score. A score of 1 or 2 was defined as favourable outcome. Our secondary outcome was post-discharge mortality. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed. Results Our search yielded 1215 results, of which 19 studies were included in this systematic review. The average survival rate was 32% (95% CI: 29-34%, I2=0%, p=0.16). In the surviving patients, the pooled percentage of favourable neurological outcome was 82% (95% CI: 77- 85%, I2=60%, p=0.12). Conclusion ECPR as treatment for in-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with a large proportion of patients with good neurological outcome. The large proportion of favourable outcome could potentially be explained by the selection of patients for treatment using ECPR. Moreover, survival is higher than described in the conventional CPR literature. As indications for ECPR might extend to older or more fragile patient populations in the future, research should focus on increasing survival, while maintaining optimal neurological outcome.

scholarly journals Neurological outcome after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Critical Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Yaël Gravesteijn ◽  
Marc Schluep ◽  
Maksud Disli ◽  
Prakriti Garkhail ◽  
Dinis Dos Reis Miranda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

scholarly journals Survival of pediatric patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melaku Bimerew ◽  
Adam Wondmieneh ◽  
Getnet Gedefaw ◽  
Teshome Gebremeskel ◽  
Asmamaw Demis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Review ◽  
Probability Of Survival ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background In-hospital cardiac arrest is a major public health issue. It is a serious condition; most probably end up with death within a few minutes even with corrective measures. However, cardiopulmonary resuscitation is expected to increase the probability of survival and prevent neurological disabilities in patients with cardiac arrest. Having a pooled prevalence of survival to hospital discharge after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is vital to develop strategies targeted to increase probability of survival among patients with cardiac arrest. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of survival to hospital discharge among pediatric patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane review databases were searched. To have current (five-year) evidence, only studies published in 2016 to 2020 were included. The weighted inverse variance random-effects model at 95%CI was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of survival. Heterogeneity assessment, test of publication bias, and subgroup analyses were also employed accordingly. Results Twenty-five articles with a total sample size of 28,479 children were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of survival to hospital discharge was found to be 46% (95% CI = 43.0–50.0%; I2 = 96.7%; p < 0.001). Based on subgroup analysis by “continent” and “income level”, lowest prevalence of pooled survival was observed in Asia (six studies; pooled survival =36.0% with 95% CI = 19.01–52.15%; I2 = 97.4%; p < 0.001) and in low and middle income countries (six studies, pooled survival = 34.0% with 95% CI = 17.0–51.0%, I2 = 97.67%, p < 0.001) respectively. Conclusion Although there was an extremely high heterogeneity among reported results (I2 = 96.7%), in this meta-analysis more than half of pediatric patients (54%) who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest did not survived to hospital discharge. Therefore, developing further strategies and encouraging researches might be crucial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document