Developing Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) to improve diagnosis and treatment of social deficits in psychiatric disorders: The Mirror Neuron System as a model

2013 ◽  
Vol 151 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 293-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiza Singh ◽  
David Feifel
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Xu ◽  
Xiaoxiao Zheng ◽  
Shuxia Yao ◽  
Jialin Li ◽  
Meina Fu ◽  
...  

The amygdala is a core node in the social brain which exhibits structural and functional abnormalities in Autism spectrum disorder and there is evidence that the mirror neuron system (MNS) can functionally compensate for impaired emotion processing following amygdala lesions. In the current study, we employed an fMRI paradigm in 241 subjects investigating MNS and amygdala responses to observation, imagination and imitation of dynamic facial expressions and whether these differed in individuals with higher as opposed to lower autistic traits. Results indicated that individuals with higher compared to lower autistic traits showed reduced left amygdala responses to imitation and enhanced responses in the left superior temporal sulcus (STS) of the MNS to observation, imagination and imitation. Additionally, functional connectivity between the left amygdala and the left STS as well as some other MNS regions was increased in individuals with higher autistic traits, especially during imitation of fearful expressions. The amygdala-MNS connectivity significantly moderated autistic group differences on recognition memory for fearful faces and real-life social network indices, indicating that increased amygdala-MNS connectivity could diminish the social behavioral differences between higher and lower autistic trait groups. Overall, findings demonstrate decreased imitation-related amygdala activity in individuals with higher autistic traits in the context of increased cortical MNS activity and amygdala-MNS connectivity which may functionally compensate for amygdala dysfunction and social deficits. Training targeting the MNS may capitalize on this compensatory mechanism for therapeutic benefits in Autism spectrum disorder.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphael Bernier ◽  
Geraldine Dawson ◽  
Stanley Lunde

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Alka ◽  
J Klann ◽  
M Staedtgen ◽  
IG Meister ◽  
W Huber

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie N. L. Schmidt ◽  
Joachim Hass ◽  
Peter Kirsch ◽  
Daniela Mier

2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (7) ◽  
pp. 1288-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Eisen ◽  
Roger Lemon ◽  
Matthew C. Kiernan ◽  
Michael Hornberger ◽  
Martin R. Turner

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 2113-2113 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Borghi ◽  
F. Binkofski

The ability to understand intentions of actions performed by others is one of the prerequisites for social interaction. This ability has been attributed to our capacity to mentalize others’ behaviour, by simulating or predicting their mental states that would cause that behaviour and make it comprehensible. Brain imaging studies revealed the so called “mentalizng network” including the pSTS/TPJ, the temporal poles and the medial prefrontal cortex. This network gets constantly activated anytime we try to take the perspective of others or try to simulate their state of mind. On the other hand the discovery of mirror neurons has provided an additional explanation for understanding of the content of actions. The functional properties of these neurons point out that action understanding is primarily based on a mechanism that directly matches the sensory representation of perceived actions with one's own motor representation of the same actions. We provide evidence that both systems interact closely during the processing of intentionality of actions. Thus mentalizing is not the only form of intentional understanding and motor and intentional components of action are closely interwoven. Both systems play an important role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
Sayantanava Mitra ◽  
S. Haque Nizamie ◽  
Nishant Goyal ◽  
Sai Krishna Tikka ◽  
Anjana Rao Kavoor

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document