scholarly journals Isotopic evidence for nitrate sources and controls on denitrification in groundwater beneath an irrigated agricultural district

Author(s):  
Stephen J. Harris ◽  
Dioni I. Cendón ◽  
Stuart I. Hankin ◽  
Mark A. Peterson ◽  
Shuang Xiao ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 575-583
Author(s):  
Jingtao Ding ◽  
Beidou Xi ◽  
Qigong Xu ◽  
Haibo Meng ◽  
Yujun Shen ◽  
...  

The considerable spatial and temporal variabilities of nitrogen (N) processing introduce large uncertainties for quantifying N cycles on a large scale, particularly in plain river network regions with complicated hydrographic connections and mixed multiple N sources.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e0209287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fajin Chen ◽  
Xin Zhou ◽  
Qibin Lao ◽  
Shuangling Wang ◽  
Guangzhe Jin ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 495-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel V. Panno ◽  
Keith C. Hackley ◽  
Walton R. Kelly ◽  
Hue-Hwa Hwang

1986 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Noack ◽  
Alain Decarreau ◽  
Alain Manceau

Science ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 230 (4724) ◽  
pp. 436-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. E. FAGGART ◽  
A. R. BASU ◽  
M. TATSUMOTO

2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 425-427
Author(s):  
John P. Hart ◽  
William A. Lovis ◽  
M. Anne Katzenberg

Emerson and colleagues (2020) provide new isotopic evidence on directly dated human bone from the Greater Cahokia region. They conclude that maize was not adopted in the region prior to AD 900. Placing this result within the larger context of maize histories in northeastern North America, they suggest that evidence from the lower Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River valley for earlier maize is “enigmatic” and “perplexing.” Here, we review that evidence, accumulated over the course of several decades, and question why Emerson and colleagues felt the need to offer opinions on that evidence without providing any new contradictory empirical evidence for the region.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document