Finite element modelling of machining of AISI 316 steel: Numerical simulation and experimental validation

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Maranhão ◽  
J. Paulo Davim
2019 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 341-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingyuan Zhang ◽  
Dongfang Zeng ◽  
Liantao Lu ◽  
Yuanbin Zhang ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.B. Nguyen ◽  
C.J. Wang ◽  
D.J. Mynors ◽  
M.A. English ◽  
M.A. Castellucci

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-135
Author(s):  
Stijn Hertele ◽  
Wim De Waele ◽  
Rudi Denys ◽  
Matthias Verstraete

Welds unavoidably show defects, which can negatively affect the integrity of the entire structureand, worst case, result in a failure. Defects of a considerable size should therefore be detected, assessedand, if necessary, repaired. The assessment of a defect requires a procedure which allows a conservativeestimation of the acceptability of the defect. To develop such procedure, both experimental and numericalresearch is performed. This paper describes the inherent possibilities and limitations of numerical researchthrough finite element modelling, as compared to experimental research. Summarizing all arguments, itbecomes clear that numerical research is a highly powerful tool, but a thorough experimental validation is ofparamount importance. Moreover, some specific weld-related problems are highly difficult to address,namely the presence of stable crack growth and material heterogeneity. More research is needed toachieve a description of these phenomena, under a set of conservative assumptions.


Author(s):  
Enrico Salvati ◽  
Cyril Besnard ◽  
Robert A. Harper ◽  
Thomas Moxham ◽  
Richard M. Shelton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document