Suicide bomber mobilization and kin and peer ties

2022 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 36-54
Author(s):  
Jared Edgerton
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 115081
Author(s):  
Zahid Halim ◽  
Raja Usman Ahmed Khan ◽  
Muhammad Waqas ◽  
Shanshan Tu
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 88-89
Author(s):  
Benjamin Myers
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 436-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. John Spencer
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Evan Avraham Alpert ◽  
Shamai A. Grossman
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
pp. 754-756
Author(s):  
Jeffry L. Kashuk ◽  
Shamai A. Grossman
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
pp. 129-140
Author(s):  
Sophia Moskalenko ◽  
Clark McCauley

This chapter evaluates the moral threat of suicide terrorism. Political and psychological resilience to the threat of suicide bombing requires understanding the difference between suicide bombers and true martyrs. A martyr’s political power comes from the indisputable evidence—the martyr’s own suffering at the hands of the powerful—that the powerful are corrupt and unjust. This evidence is tainted if the would-be martyr indulges in provocation, aggression, or retaliation. The authors offer three directions that can help boost Western political resilience in facing suicide bombers, emphasizing the importance of clearly understanding the definitions of martyr, victim, suicide bomber, and terrorist and how perceptions can be changed in the immediate aftermath of an attack or an uprising.


2015 ◽  
pp. 56-67
Author(s):  
Richard Boothby
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (869) ◽  
pp. 71-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Munir

AbstractSuicide attacks are a recurrent feature of many conflicts. Whereas warfare heroism and martyrdom are allowed in certain circumstances in times of war, a suicide bomber might be committing at least five crimes according to Islamic law, namely killing civilians, mutilating their bodies, violating the trust of enemy soldiers and civilians, committing suicide and destroying civilian objects or properties. The author examines such attacks from an Islamic jus in bello perspective.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-393
Author(s):  
Neil K. Aggarwal

AbstractThis paper complicates the notion of the suicide bomber as represented in mental health literature. Most authors apply Western psychiatric concepts to understand suicide bombers without accounting for value differences around life and death or terrorism and martyrdom. Accordingly, these researchers replicate arguments to explain individual behaviour from a particular epistemological perspective. In contrast, critical approaches to this literature can expose the worldviews of the analysers and the analysed to devise sounder interpretations. This paper scrutinises mental health discourse on suicide bombing to ask: (1) What do we learn about the authors of suicide bombers in these articles? (2) How do their analyses demonstrate the relationship between knowledge and power? These conclusions can enable researchers to reduce biases and devise behavioural models that more accurately reflect the realities of their subjects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document