scholarly journals PRETUS: A plug-in based platform for real-time ultrasound imaging research

SoftwareX ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 100959
Author(s):  
Alberto Gomez ◽  
Veronika A. Zimmer ◽  
Gavin Wheeler ◽  
Nicolas Toussaint ◽  
Shujie Deng ◽  
...  
Ultrasonics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 6-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiyue Sun ◽  
Dawei Wu ◽  
Benpeng Zhu ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Shi Chen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Corvino ◽  
Orlando Catalano ◽  
Fabio Corvino ◽  
Antonella Petrillo

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 1687-1698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nima Akhlaghi ◽  
Clayton A. Baker ◽  
Mohamed Lahlou ◽  
Hozaifah Zafar ◽  
Karthik G. Murthy ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanshan Lin ◽  
Bo Zhu ◽  
Yiyi Zheng ◽  
Guozhi Huang ◽  
Qing Zeng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Real-time ultrasound imaging (RUSI) has been increasingly used as a form of biofeedback when instructing and re-training muscle contraction. However, the effectiveness of the RUSI on a single sustained contraction of the lumbar multifidus (LM) and transversus abdominis (TrA) has rarely been reported. This preliminary study aimed to determine if the use of RUSI, as visual biofeedback, could enhance the ability of activation and continuous contraction of the trunk muscles including LM and TrA.Methods: Forty healthy individuals were included and randomly assigned into the experimental group and control group. All subjects performed a preferential activation of the LM and/or TrA (maintained the constraction of LM and/or TrA for 30 seconds and then relaxed for two minutes), while those in the experimental group also received visual feedback provided by RUSI. The thickness of LM and/or TrA at rest and during contraction (Tc-max, T15s, and T30s) were extracted and recorded. The experiment was repeated three times.Results: No significant differences were found in the thickness of LM at rest (P > 0.999), Tc-max (P > 0.999), and T15s (P = 0.414) between the two groups. However, the ability to recruit LM muscle contraction differed between groups at T30s (P = 0.006), with subjects in the experimental group that received visual ultrasound biofeedback maintaining a relative maximum contraction. Besides, no significant differences were found in the TrA muscle thickness at rest (P > 0.999) and Tc-max (P > 0.999) between the two groups. However, significant differences of contraction thickness were found at T15s (P = 0.031) and T30s (P = 0.010) between the two groups during the Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver (ADIM), with greater TrA muscle contraction thickness in the experimental group.Conclusions: RUSI can be used to provide visual biofeedback, which can promote continuous contraction, and improve the ability to activate the LM and TrA muscles in healthy subjects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document