Time to first take-back operation predicts successful primary fascial closure in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy

Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Pommerening ◽  
Joseph J. DuBose ◽  
Martin D. Zielinski ◽  
Herb A. Phelan ◽  
Thomas M. Scalea ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chadi T. Abouassaly ◽  
William D. Dutton ◽  
Victor Zaydfudim ◽  
Lesly A. Dossett ◽  
Timothy C. Nunez ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. 1178-1182
Author(s):  
Margaret H. Lauerman ◽  
Joseph J. Dubose ◽  
Deborah M. Stein ◽  
Samuel M. Galvagno ◽  
Matthew J. Bradley ◽  
...  

Management of patients undergoing damage control laparotomy (DCL) involves many surgical, medical, and logistical factors. Ideal patient management optimizing fascial closure with regard to timing and closure techniques remains unclear. A retrospective review of patients undergoing DCL from 2000 to 2012 at an urban Level I trauma center was undertaken. Mortality of DCL decreased over the study period from 62.5 to 34.6 per cent, whereas enterocutaneous fistula rate decreased from 12.5 to 3.8 per cent. Delayed primary fascial closure rate improved from 22.2 to 88.2 per cent. Time to closure ( P < 0.001), time to first attempted closure ( P < 0.001), and number of explorations ( P < 0.001) were associated with ability to achieve delayed primary fascial closure. In subgroup analysis, achievement of delayed primary fascial closure was decreased with time to closure after one week (91.7% vs 52.0%, P = 0.002) and time to first attempted closure after two days (86.5% vs 70.0%, P = 0.042). In multivariate analysis, time to closure (odds ratio: 0.13, 95% confidence interval: 0.04–0.39; P < 0.001) and time to first attempted closure (odds ratio: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.37–0.99; P = 0.046) were the only factors associated with achieving delayed primary fascial closure. Timing of attempted closure plays a significant role in attaining delayed primary fascial closure, highlighting the importance of early re-exploration.


2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1429-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quinton M. Hatch ◽  
Lisa M. Osterhout ◽  
Asma Ashraf ◽  
Jeanette Podbielski ◽  
Rosemary A. Kozar ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 660-661
Author(s):  
M.J. Pommerening ◽  
J.J. DuBose ◽  
M.D. Zielinski ◽  
H.A. Phelan ◽  
T.M. Scalea ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naeem Goussous ◽  
Donald H. Jenkins ◽  
Martin D. Zielinski

Author(s):  
Beatriz Bibiana Aguirre Patiño ◽  
Fernando Rodríguez Holguín ◽  
Julián Chica ◽  
Carlos Gallego ◽  
Alberto Federico García Marín

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohta Tanahashi ◽  
Hisaho Sato ◽  
Akiko Kawakami ◽  
Shusaku Sasaki ◽  
Yu nishinari ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Delayed anastomosis is a treatment strategy used in damage control laparotomy (DCL). During temporary abdominal closure (TAC) with DCL, infusion volume, and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) output volume are associated with the success and prognosis of primary fascial closure (PFC). The same may also hold true for anastomosis. The aim of this research is to evaluate whether the difference between early anastomosis and delayed anastomosis in DCL is related to infusion volume and NPWT output volume.Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis targeted patients managed with TAC during emergency surgery for trauma or intra-abdominal sepsis between January 2011 and December 2019. It included patients who underwent repair/anastomosis/artificial anus construction in the first surgery and patients who underwent intestinal resection in the first surgery followed by delayed anastomosis with no intestinal continuity. The main outcomes were infusion volume, NPWT output volume and complications.Results: One hundred nine patients who underwent emergency surgery were evaluated. Seventy-three patients were managed with TAC using NPWT. In 16 patients with early anastomosis and 21 patients with delayed anastomosis, there was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.2318) or NPWT output volume (p=0.7128) 48 hours after surgery. Additionally, there was no difference in the occurrence of surgical site infection (p=0.315) and suture failure (p=0.8428). During the second-look surgery after 48 hours, the anastomosis was further postponed for 48% of the patients who underwent delayed anastomosis. There was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.0783) up to the second-look surgery between the patients whose delayed anastomosis was postponed and those who underwent delayed anastomosis, but there was a tendency toward a large NPWT output volume (p=0.024) in the postponed delayed anastomosis group. Anastomosis and PFC were achieved for all patients whose delayed anastomosis was postponed.Conclusions: The presence or absence of anastomosis during TAC management does not affect NPWT output volume. Delayed anastomosis may be managed with the same infusion volume as that used for early anastomosis. There is also the option of postponing anastomosis if the planned delayed anastomosis is complicated.Trial RegistrationThe retrospective protocol of this study was approved by our institutional review board (MH2018-611).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document