Profile of the Ammonium Acid Urate Stone Former Based on a Large Contemporary Cohort

Urology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 43-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek J. Lomas ◽  
Christopher D. Jaeger ◽  
Amy E. Krambeck
Author(s):  
Janina Paula T. Sy-Go ◽  
Ladan Zand ◽  
Peter C. Harris ◽  
John C. Lieske
Keyword(s):  

Nephron ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Bataille ◽  
André Pruna ◽  
Isabelle Grégoire ◽  
Geneviève Charransol ◽  
Jean-François de Frémont ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
pp. 86-86
Author(s):  
I. P. Heilberg ◽  
L. A. Martini ◽  
V. L. Szejnfeld ◽  
A. B. Carvalho ◽  
S. A. Draibe ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
pp. 355-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Chandhoke ◽  
R. Dunlay ◽  
P. Stein ◽  
J. Nitz ◽  
K. A. Hruska

1979 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.C. Bowyer ◽  
R.K. McCulloch ◽  
J.G. Brockis ◽  
G.D. Ryan

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. e268-e269
Author(s):  
G. Anan ◽  
T. Yoneyama ◽  
Y. Tobisawa ◽  
S. Hatakeyama ◽  
M. Yoneyama ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 139 (5) ◽  
pp. 1111-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Azoury ◽  
J. Weininger ◽  
A. Iaina ◽  
S. Abrashkin

2002 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 652-655
Author(s):  
Yasuyo Yamamoto ◽  
Yasushi Kurokawa ◽  
Natsuo Oka ◽  
Masayuki Takahasi ◽  
Tomoharu Fukumori ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Conte ◽  
P. Roca ◽  
M. Gianotti ◽  
F. Grases
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommie Prasetyo ◽  
Ponco Birowo ◽  
Nur Rasyid

Objective: We were comparing the urinary stone risk profiles in stone former subjects group with normal population (non stone-former) group. Material & method: In this study, each group consist of 10 subjects. Urine samples used was a 24-hour-urine. All subjects in this study were previously informed and voluntarily participating. Inclusion criteria in this study were adult, stone free, residing in Jakarta. Measurement was performed in Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Faculty of Medicine Indonesia University. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20 (Chicago, USA) with Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney (p < 0.05 was considered significant). Results: There was a significant difference in the mean age of two groups with no significant difference in weight and height. Significant difference (p < 0.05) in urinary profile was found in urea, uric acid, chloride, potassium, phosphate, and ammonia. Conversely, we found no significant differences (p > 0.05) in sodium, creatinine, calcium, magnesium, oxalate, and citrate levels. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in urinary stone promoting and inhibiting factors between two groups. Bigger number of sample size with better sampling method must be conducted for future studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document