scholarly journals Impact of Accountable Care Organizations on Diagnostic Testing for Prostate Cancer

Urology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 68-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy N. Luckenbaugh ◽  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
Samuel R. Kaufman ◽  
Phyllis Yan ◽  
Lindsey A. Herrel ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian P. Meyer ◽  
Anna Krasnova ◽  
Jesse D. Sammon ◽  
Philipp Gild ◽  
Nicolas von Landenberg ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (Supplement 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Putnam Cole* ◽  
Anna Krasnova ◽  
Ashwin Ramaswamy ◽  
David Fallon Friedlander ◽  
Sean Anthony Fletcher ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quoc-Dien Trinh ◽  
Maxine Sun ◽  
Anna Krasnova ◽  
Ashwin Ramaswamy ◽  
Alexander P. Cole ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18308-e18308
Author(s):  
Quoc-Dien Trinh ◽  
Christian Meyer ◽  
Anna Krasnova ◽  
Jesse Sammon ◽  
Stuart R. Lipsitz ◽  
...  

e18308 Background: Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) were established under the Affordable Care Act as a new payment model intended to impose greater responsibility on all stakeholders for cost control and quality improvement. Preventive services are an ideal target to monitor the effectiveness of new health care delivery models. We sought to examine and compare the prevalence of breast cancer screening (BCa-S), and prostate cancer screening (PCa-S) between ACO and traditional Medicare beneficiaries. We hypothesized that the use of BCa-S is higher among beneficiaries attributed to an ACO, whereas the use of PCa-S, a non-recommended test, would be unaffected by ACO assignment. Methods: Using a random 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we assessed BCa-S in women aged < 75, (evidence-based cancer screening), and PCa-S in men < 75 (non-recommended cancer screening) between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013 with appropriate exclusion criteria following the review of guideline recommendations. ACO coverage was ascertained from the quarterly assignment in the Shared Savings Program ACO Beneficiary-level file. Propensity-score weighting was performed to balance out patient and sociodemographic covariates. Results: Following propensity-score weighting, our final cohorts of ACO and traditional Medicare beneficiaries included 52,987 and 526,063 women for BCa-S; 86,936 and 814,221 men for PCa-S, respectively. The prevalence of screening in ACO vs. traditional Medicare were 35.0% vs. 25.2% for BCa-S, and 54.6% vs. 41.7% for PCa-S (all p < 0.001) Conclusions: The ACO model appears to have a salutary effect on preventive service utilization. Our findings vis-à-vis PCa-S among ACOs are likely a reflection of improved health care access rather than vetted screening practices. There is hope that such nonrecommended screening will decrease if more ACOs are required to move towards a “two-sided” risk shared savings and loss model.


2018 ◽  
Vol 199 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parth Modi ◽  
Samuel Kaufman ◽  
Tudor Borza ◽  
Lindsey Herrel ◽  
John M. Hollingsworth ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6546-6546
Author(s):  
Quoc-Dien Trinh ◽  
Alexander P Cole ◽  
Anna Krasnova ◽  
Ashwin Ramaswamy ◽  
David F. Friedlander ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 131-131
Author(s):  
Daniel Lee ◽  
Sunita Thapa ◽  
Amy J Graves ◽  
Melinda Buntin ◽  
David F. Penson ◽  
...  

131 Background: Accountable care organizations (ACO) reflect a payment innovation aimed to orient incentives to improve quality and reduce waste. The objective of this study was to determine whether ACO enrollment affects racial disparities in cancer screening, and to characterize the impact on the appropriateness of prostate cancer screening in minority populations. Methods: We built a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries from 2007 to 2013 were comprising a cohort of 11,087,056 person-years among ACO beneficiaries and 37,187,979 person-years among non-ACO beneficiaries. A difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) approach was utilized to identify the effect of ACO enrollment on cancer screening in racial/ethnic minorities relative to non-Hispanic whites. We then characterized differences in screening appropriateness after ACO enrollment using age (65-74 vs. 75+) and predicted survival (top vs. bottom quartile). Results: ACO enrollment was associated with approximately a 5% reduction in prostate cancer overscreening for white beneficiaries, namely among the elderly and those with unfavorable predicted survival. Compared to white men in the lowest quartile of predicted survival, Asian and Hispanic men with similarly low survival had a 4.8% and 13.0% relative increase in prostate cancer screening associated with ACO enrollment (DDD p = 0.015, p = 0.011, respectively). Prostate cancer overscreening was common among Asian men, with 46% of elderly Asian men attributed to an ACO undergoing cancer screening compared to 28% of elderly white men. Furthermore, ACO enrollment was associated with a 2.7% increase in screening relative to whites (DDD p = 0.0005). Compared to white beneficiaries, black men had consistently lower rates of prostate cancer screening. ACO enrollment did not narrow the disparity of prostate cancer screening between healthier (DDD p = 0.75) or younger (DDD p = 0.27) black and white beneficiaries. Conclusions: This study provides evidence of ACO-mediated increases in low-value screening for prostate cancer among sick and elderly Hispanics and Asians. Furthermore, ACO enrollment did not narrow known disparities in high-value prostate cancer screening among healthier and younger black men.


Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 124 (16) ◽  
pp. 3364-3371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parth K. Modi ◽  
Samuel R. Kaufman ◽  
Tudor Borza ◽  
Phyllis Yan ◽  
David C. Miller ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document