Onco-testicular sperm extraction (oncoTESE): A Contemporary Concept Review and Report of Australian Sperm Retrieval Rates and Fertility Outcomes

Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gideon Adam Blecher ◽  
Eric Chung ◽  
Darren Katz ◽  
Kim Shannon ◽  
John Bailee
Keyword(s):  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Concept Review

Can Testicular Size Be a Predictive Factor for Successful Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Non Obstructive Azoospermia?

2019 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Omer Yumusak ◽  
Mehmet Cinar ◽  
Serkan Kahyaoglu ◽  
Yasemin Tasci ◽  
Gul Nihal Buyuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicle Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
High Serum ◽  
Testicular Volume ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Total Testosterone ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Stimulating Hormone

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> Non-obstructive azoospermia, defined as absence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate caused by impaired spermatogenesis, is the most severe cause of male infertility. It is typically presented as high serum follicle stimulating hormone levels and atrophic testis. The combination of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and Microdissection testicular sperm extraction allows these infertile men the opportunity to have their own children from their own testis. Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of micro-Testicular sperm extraction in men with atrophic testis.</p><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> The medical records of 80 non-obstructive men with azoospermia who underwent micro-TESE were retrospectively evaluated. We assessed clinical parameters; age, duration of infertility, smoking, chromosomal karyotype, Y chromosome microdeletion, follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, total testosterone and testicular volume in relation with Microdissection testicular sperm extraction results.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Testicular sperm retrieval rate was 53% in 80 patients. Testicular volume, serum follicle stimulating hormone and total testosterone concentrations showed correlation with the results of sperm retrieval. These three parameters were found to be significant risk factors with testicular sperm extraction negative patients (p&lt;0.001). The odds ratios (95% CI) were 6.39 (1.25–26.58), 1.24 (1.11-1.36), 1.13 (0.99-1.21) respectively. Testicular volume was found to be a discriminative parameter in patients with negative sperm retrieval. The cut-off point was established as 6.75 ml for testicular volume with 88.1% sensitivity, 62.1% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Microdissection testicular sperm extraction is the most effective procedure for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Testicular volume, serum follicle stimulating hormone and testosterone levels can be predictive factors for sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.</p>

scholarly journals Intraoperative assessment of tubules in predicting microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome in men with Sertoli cell-only syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 722-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yu ◽  
Qi Xi ◽  
Ruixue Wang ◽  
Hongguo Zhang ◽  
Leilei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sertoli Cell ◽  
Follicle Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Seminiferous Tubules ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Intraoperative Assessment ◽  
Retrieval Rate ◽  
Surgical Suture ◽  
Tubule Diameter

Objective This study aimed to assess the value of measuring the tubule diameter during microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in predicting outcomes in patients with Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS). Methods Fifty-six consecutive patients with SCOS were included. Patients were classified into two groups on the basis of the diameter of seminiferous tubules measured against 5/0 surgical suture (≥100 µm or <100 µm). Results The sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm was significantly lower than that in those with <100 µm (3.1% vs. 25.0%). The SRR from the contralateral testis in men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm was lower than that in those with <100 µm (0% vs. 14.3%). Men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm had a significantly larger testis and lower follicle-stimulating hormone levels than did men with <100 µm (8.1 ± 2.4 vs. 5.3±1.8 mL, 19.9 ± 9.7 vs. 25.9 ± 7.1 mIU/mL, respectively). Conclusions The diameter of tubules is a useful predictor for a successful SRR in men with SCOS. Intraoperative assessment of homogeneous large tubules allows some men to perform a limited (superficial) contralateral micro-TESE after no spermatozoa are initially identified.

Age does not adversely affect sperm retrieval in men undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction

2014 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 653-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjith Ramasamy ◽  
Nikunj N. Trivedi ◽  
Jennifer E. Reifsnyder ◽  
Gianpiero D. Palermo ◽  
Zev Rosenwaks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval

P–038 Clinical outcomes of 77 testicular sperm extraction treatment cycles in non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Barros ◽  
M Cunha ◽  
A Barros ◽  
S Dória ◽  
M Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection ◽  
Klinefelter Syndrome ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Testicular Volume ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Aneuploidy Screening ◽  
Testicular Sperm Retrieval

Abstract Study question What are the clinical results of patients with azoospermia and nonmosaic Klinefelter syndrome, using fresh and cryopreserved sperm? Summary answer The results showed a recovery rate of testicular sperm in the order of 40% and a life newborn rate of 52% when using fresh sperm What is known already In Klinefelter syndrome (KS), the rates of successful testicular sperm retrieval were shown to be similar either using conventional TESE or micro-TESE (Corona et al., 2017), which highlights that the variability observed between studies is due to differences in patient characteristics. There are a few works with a large number of KS patients elucidating the clinical outcomes using fresh and cryopreserved testicular sperm. However, these studies revealed contradictory outcomes, either revealing better (Greco et al., 2013; Vicdan et al., 2016) or worst (Madureira et al., 2014) results with cryopreserved testicular sperm, or finding no differences (Chen et al, 2019). Study design, size, duration This study includes all patients up to 2019 presenting azoospermia due to non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome (n = 76) that went for infertility consultations in a private fertility clinic. Patients were evaluated by the same Urologist. The genetic analysis of the patients was performed at an academic institution. At examination patients did not refer other complaints besides infertility, and referred to have not received any hormone replacement therapy in the past. Participants/materials, setting, methods The 76 azoospermic patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome (KS) were treated by testicular sperm extraction (TESE) followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), using fresh and cryopreserved testicular sperm. Most patients used fresh testicular sperm, where others preferred to postpone ICSI treatment cycles and used cryopreserved testicular sperm. Aneuploidy screening in children was performed by prenatal diagnosis and MLPA (Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification). Full embryological, clinical and newborn outcomes are provided. Main results and the role of chance Of the 76 patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome, one repeated the testicular sperm extraction (TESE) procedure. Testicular sperm were recovered in 31/77 (40.3%) of the cases. Comparisons between the 31 cases with successful sperm recover (group–1) and the 46 cases without a successful TESE (group–2) revealed no significant differences regarding age, time of infertility, testicular volume, serum levels of FSH, LH and testosterone, total number of testicular fragments analyzed, and time of search in samples. The mean male age was 34 years. In most of the cases, the testicular volume was reduced (96.1%), the levels of FSH (98.3%) and LH (94.1%) were increased, and the levels of testosterone were normal (77.6%). There were 25 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment cycles using fresh testicular sperm and 22 ICSI treatment cycles using frozen testicular sperm. The rates of fertilization (63.5% fresh sperm vs 41.6% frozen sperm), implantation (37% fresh sperm vs 13.2% frozen sperm), clinical pregnancy (60.9% fresh sperm vs 19% frozen sperm), live birth delivery (52.2% fresh sperm vs 19% frozen sperm) and newborn (65.2% fresh sperm vs 23.8% frozen sperm) were higher in the group using fresh testicular sperm. Chromosome analysis of the 21 newborn was normal. Limitations, reasons for caution Although presenting a high number of cases with azoospermic non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome treated with testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, future studies are needed with a higher number of cycles using frozen testicular sperm, in order to confirm or rebut that the freezing methodology affects negatively the clinical outcomes. Wider implications of the findings: Data adds further information regarding testicular sperm retrieval rates and use of fresh or frozen testicular sperm in Klinefelter syndrome (KS) patients. High newborn rates were obtained only with fresh testicular sperm. Results also reassure KS patients about the safety relative to any abnormal chromosomal transmission to the born children. Trial registration number Not applicable

P–002 Prediction model for salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with failed conventional testicular sperm extraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Caroppo ◽  
F Castiglioni ◽  
C Campagna ◽  
E M Colpi ◽  
E Piatti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Internal Validity ◽  
Prediction Equation ◽  
Seminiferous Tubules ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
High Magnification ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Discrimination Ability ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Study question Is there any intra-surgical parameter able to predict the outcome of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in patients with previous failed TESE? Summary answer Among all the variables under consideration, only the seminiferous tubules (ST) caliber pattern found at high magnification was able to significantly predict the mTESE outcome... What is known already Several studies have demonstrated that no clinical or hormonal parameters are able to predict the outcome of a salvage mTESE performed in patients with previous sperm retrieval failure (SRF). It has been previously demonstrated that a prediction model with the combination of two intra-surgical parameters such as the STs caliber, defined as dilated tubule (DT), slightly dilated tubules (SDT) and not dilated tubules (NDT), and testis histology had an excellent discrimination ability (AUC 0.93) to distinguish between cases with and without the outcome, but such prediction model has not been tested in patients undergoing salvage mTESE. Study design, size, duration A prediction model was built on a dataset of 63 patients, 29–50 years old, undergoing unilateral (15 ) or bilateral (48) salvage mTESE after failed TESE from 2015 through 2019, with a resulting N = 111 testes under consideration. Two models were compared, one with STs and histology as covariates, the other with STs alone: the second model was chosen due to better discrimination... Participants/materials, setting, methods we assessed internal validity with a bootstrapping procedure for a realistic estimate of the performance of the prediction model in similar future patients with NOA undergoing salvage mTESE. We repeated the entire modeling process in 259 samples drawn with replacement from the original sample, and determined the performances (AUC, sensitivity, specificity) of the selected prediction model. Calibration (correspondence between the predicted and observed probabilities) was visually assessed by inspecting the calibration belt... Main results and the role of chance Sperm retrieval was successful in 24 out of 63 patients (38%): age, testis volume and hormonal parameters did not vary among patients with successful sperm retrieval (SSR) or SRF. The prevalent histological pattern was Sertoli cell only syndrome (69.6%), while hypospermatogenesis, maturation arrest and hyalinosis were found in 4.5%, 23% and 1.8% of cases. The STs pattern was heterogeneous, with DTs being found only in 23.4% of testes. Sperm were found in 69% of DTs, 29% of SDTs, and 5% of NDTs. The prediction model correctly classified 82.88% of patients and explained the 26.5% variability of the outcome. The STs pattern significantly predicted the mTESE outcome with a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 90.2%, PPV 69.2%, NPV 87%. Both SDT (OR 0.105, 95% CI 0.034–0.317, p &lt; 0.0001) and NDT (OR 0.024, 95% CI 0.004–0.128, p &lt; 0.0001) were negatively associated with the chance of retrieving sperm, the resulting prediction equation being Log (SSR)= 0.81 – 2.2 SDT – 3.7 NDT. The model had a clearly useful discrimination (AUC 0.813). The optimism corrected AUC was 0.7977, and the model was well calibrated (p = 1.00) with both the 80% and 95% calibration belts encompassing the bisector over the whole range of the predicted probabilities Limitations, reasons for caution The STs caliber pattern was subjectively evaluated at high magnification (24–36x) by comparing the individual ST appearance with the surrounding ones, however such evaluation was performed by the same experienced urologist with more than 1000 mTESE procedures performed to date. Wider implications of the findings: No clinical data but the STs appearance at high magnification could discriminate between patients with and without chances of SSR. These results reinforce the evidence supporting the superiority of mTESE compared to conventional TESE in retrieving sperm, particularly in lower prognosis patients with NOA such as those with previous SR. Trial registration number Not applicable

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document