Can preoperative renal mass biopsy change clinical practice and reduce surgical intervention for small renal masses?

Author(s):  
Zhamshid Okhunov ◽  
Michael A. Gorin ◽  
Francis A. Jefferson ◽  
Andrew Shea Afyouni ◽  
Mohamad E. Allaf ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 356-363
Author(s):  
Melinda M Protani ◽  
Andre Joshi ◽  
Victoria White ◽  
David JT Marco ◽  
Rachel E Neale ◽  
...  

Aims: Renal mass biopsy (RMB) is advocated to improve management of small renal masses, however there is concern about its clinical utility. This study aimed to elicit opinions about the role of RMB in small renal mass management from surgeons managing renal cell carcinomas (RCC), and examine the frequency of pre-treatment biopsy in those with RCC. Methods: All surgeons in two Australian states (Queensland: n = 59 and Victoria: n = 108) who performed nephrectomies for RCC in 2012/2013 were sent questionnaires to ascertain views about RMB. Response rates were 54% for Queensland surgeons and 38% for Victorian surgeons. We used medical records data from RCC patients to determine RMB frequency. Results: Most Queensland (81%) and Victorian (59%) surgeons indicated they rarely requested RMB; however 34% of Victorians reported often requesting RMB, compared with no Queensland surgeons. This was consistent with medical records data: 17.6% of Victorian patients with T1a tumours received RMB versus 6.7% of Queensland patients ( p < 0.001). Surgeons’ principal concerns regarding RMB related to sampling reliability (90%) and/or histopathological interpretation (76%). Conclusions: Most surgeons report infrequent use of RMB for small renal masses, however we observed practice variation. The principal reasons for infrequent use were concerns about sampling reliability and histopathological interpretation, which may be valid in regions with less access to interventional radiologists and uropathologists. Further evidence is required to define patient groups for whom biopsy results will alter management. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.


Author(s):  
Dae Y. Kim ◽  
Christopher G. Wood ◽  
Jose A. Karam

OVERVIEW: The incidental renal mass represents a heterogeneous group that contains both benign and malignant pathologies. The majority of renal cell carcinomas are discovered incidentally, without the presence of symptoms directly related to the mass, and are closely associated with the term small renal masses because of the discovery before the onset of symptoms. In general, small renal masses are defined as 4 cm or smaller, and may account for greater than half of renal cell carcinoma diagnosis. The use of renal mass biopsy may offer additional pathological information but the clinician must be reminded of the technical and diagnostic limitations of renal mass biopsy. Patient-dependent factors, such as life expectancy and comorbidities, guide the management of small renal masses, which include active surveillance, partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, and ablative techniques (cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation). Partial nephrectomy has demonstrated durable oncologic control for small renal masses while preserving renal function and, if feasible, is the current treatment of choice. In the other extreme of the renal cell carcinomas spectrum and in the presence of metastatic disease, the removal of the renal primary tumor is termed cytoreductive nephrectomy. Two randomized trials (SWOG 8949 and EORTC 30947) have demonstrated a survival benefit with cytoreductive nephrectomy before the initiation of immunotherapy. These two studies have also been the motivation to perform cytoreductive nephrectomy in the targeted therapy era. Currently, there are two ongoing randomized prospective trials accruing to investigate the timing and relevance of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the contemporary setting of targeted therapy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 193 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark W. Ball ◽  
Stephania M. Bezerra ◽  
Michael A. Gorin ◽  
Morgan Cowan ◽  
Christian P. Pavlovich ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. A305
Author(s):  
Y. Wang ◽  
A.B. Althaus ◽  
J.J. Leow ◽  
I. Tinay ◽  
F.J. Gelpi-Hammerschmidt ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 88-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sapan N. Ambani ◽  
Todd M. Morgan ◽  
Jeffrey S. Montgomery ◽  
Adam J. Gadzinski ◽  
Bruce L. Jacobs ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (36) ◽  
pp. 3591-3600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Sanchez ◽  
Adam S. Feldman ◽  
A. Ari Hakimi

Renal cancer represents 2% to 3% of all cancers, and its incidence is rising. The increased use of ultrasonography and cross-sectional imaging has resulted in the clinical dilemma of incidentally detected small renal masses (SRMs). SRMs represent a heterogeneous group of tumors that span the full spectrum of metastatic potential, including benign, indolent, and more aggressive tumors. Currently, no composite model or biomarker exists that accurately predicts the diagnosis of kidney cancer before treatment selection, and the use of renal mass biopsy remains controversial. The management of SRMs has changed dramatically over the last two decades as our understanding of tumor biology and competing risks of mortality in this population has improved. In this review, we critically assess published consensus guidelines and recent literature on the diagnosis and management of SRMs, with a focus on patient treatment selection and use of renal mass biopsy, active surveillance, and thermal ablation. Finally, we highlight important opportunities for leveraging recent research discoveries to identify patients with SRMs at high risk for renal cell carcinoma–related mortality and minimize overtreatment and patient morbidity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Song ◽  
Anderson Barrett ◽  
Jeremiah Morrissey ◽  
Jonathan Mobley ◽  
Karen Figenshau ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document