Health-Related Quality of Life Population Norms for Belize Using EQ-5D-5L

2022 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 45-52
Author(s):  
Henry Bailey ◽  
Mathieu F. Janssen ◽  
Althea La Foucade ◽  
Philip Castillo ◽  
Girjanauth Boodraj
Author(s):  
Elise Boersma-van Dam ◽  
Rens van de Schoot ◽  
Helma W. C. Hofland ◽  
Iris M. Engelhard ◽  
Nancy E. E. Van Loey

Abstract Purpose This study explored the individual trajectories of health-related quality of life (HRQL) compared to recalled pre-burn level of HRQL and investigated whether burn severity and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms increase the risk of not returning to pre-burn level of HRQL. Methods Data were obtained from 309 adult patients with burns in a multicenter study. Patients completed the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire with a Cognition bolt-on shortly after hospital admission, which included a recalled pre-injury measure, and, again, at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-burn. Burn severity was indicated by the number of surgeries, and PTSD symptoms were assessed with the IES-R at three months post-burn. Pre- and post-injury HRQL were compared to norm populations. Results Recalled pre-injury HRQL was higher than population norms and HRQL at 18 months post-burn was comparable to population norms. Compared to the pre-injury level of functioning, four HRQL patterns of change over time were established: Stable, Recovery, Deterioration, and Growth. In each HRQL domain, a subset of patients did not return to their recalled pre-injury levels, especially with regard to Pain, Anxiety/Depression, and Cognition. Patients with more severe burns or PTSD symptoms were less likely to return to pre-injury level of functioning within 18 months post-burn. Conclusion This study identified four patterns of individual change. Patients with more severe injuries and PTSD symptoms were more at risk of not returning to their recalled pre-injury HRQL. This study supports the face validity of using a recalled pre-burn HRQL score as a reference point to monitor HRQL after burns.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e108434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeewa Kularatna ◽  
Jennifer A. Whitty ◽  
Newell W. Johnson ◽  
Ruwan Jayasinghe ◽  
Paul A. Scuffham

Author(s):  
Malwina Hołownia-Voloskova ◽  
Aleksei Tarbastaev ◽  
Dominik Golicki

Abstract Purpose To develop population norms for the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire based on a representative sample of Moscow citizens. Methods We used quota sampling accounting for sex, age group and administrative district of residence. Respondents in randomly selected outdoor and indoor locations were surveyed with the official Russian paper-and-pencil version of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and a set of socio-demographic questions. We estimated four types of EQ-5D results: the distribution of limitations according to EQ-5D-5L dimensions, the perception of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS), the unweighted score for a respondent’s health state (Level Sum Score, LSS) and the Russian health preferences-based weighted score (EQ index). In order to estimate the EQ-5D-5L index, we used a newly developed Russian EQ-5D-3L value set, together with EuroQol Group cross-over methodology. Results A total of 1020 respondents (18–93 years old) from the general Moscow adult population completed the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. HRQoL domains with the largest number of identified health limitations were pain/discomfort (48.6%) and anxiety/depression (44.1%). Two hundred seventy-nine respondents (27.0%) did not report any health restrictions. The mean EQ VAS and EQ-5D-5L index were 74.1 (SD 17.3) and 0.907 (0.106) respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that female sex, advanced age and lack of access to the Internet had a negative influence on HRQoL, whereas residence in certain districts had a positive impact. Conclusions The study provides population norms of health-related quality of life in Moscow, measured according to the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. These reference values can be used to optimise the effectiveness of resource allocation in healthcare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 675-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A. Garcia-Gordillo ◽  
Daniel Collado-Mateo ◽  
Pedro R. Olivares ◽  
José C. Adsuar

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 2983-2991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edimansyah Abdin ◽  
Mythily Subramaniam ◽  
Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar ◽  
Nan Luo ◽  
Siow Ann Chong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document