scholarly journals False memories for scenes using the DRM paradigm

2021 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 48-59
Author(s):  
Filip Děchtěrenko ◽  
Jiří Lukavský ◽  
Jiří Štipl
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrin Creath Oliver ◽  
Rebecca Brooke Bays ◽  
Karen M. Zabrucky

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1600-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorie M. Colbert ◽  
Dawn M. McBride

2007 ◽  
Vol 215 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Caroline Steffens ◽  
Silvia Mecklenbräuker

Abstract. In recent years, there has been an explosion of research on false memories: The subjective experience of remembering something if that something did apparently not happen in reality. We review a range of findings concerning this phenomenon: False memories of details and of whole events by adults and children, as well as false memories of words in laboratory experiments (in the DRM paradigm). We also briefly discuss the converse phenomenon: Evidence of forgetting or repression of significant events, and evidence of recovered memories. Knowledge of both phenomena is needed for judging whether “new” memories are false, recovered, or whether both options are possible. More general as well as specific theories explaining false memories are discussed, and we close with implications for practice.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Oliveira ◽  
Pedro B. Albuquerque ◽  
Armando Machado
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten J.V. Peters ◽  
Marko Jelicic ◽  
Benny Gorski ◽  
Kevin Sijstermans ◽  
Timo Giesbrecht ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Frédérike Bax-d’Auteuil ◽  
Jacinthe Lemelin ◽  
Nicole Caza
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Soledad Beato ◽  
Jason Arndt

We report an experiment examining the factors that produce false recognition in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. We selectively manipulated the probability that critical lures produce study items in free association, known as forward associative strength (FAS), while controlling the probability that study items produce critical lures in free association, known as backward associative strength (BAS). Results showed that false recognition of critical lures failed to differ between strong and weak FAS conditions. Follow-up correlational analyses further supported this outcome, showing that FAS was not correlated with false recognition, despite substantial variability in both variables across our stimulus sets. However, these correlational analyses did produce a significant and strong relationship between BAS and false recognition. These results support views that propose false memory is produced by activation spreading from study items to critical lures during encoding, which leads critical lures to be confused with episodically-experienced events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document