Clinical Outcome of Monosegmental Total Disc Replacement for Lumbar Disc Disease with Ball-and-Socket Prosthesis (Maverick): Prospective Study with Four-Year Follow-up

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 355-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Van de Kelft ◽  
Leo Verguts
2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1262-1280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin D. van den Eerenbeemt ◽  
Raymond W. Ostelo ◽  
Barend J. van Royen ◽  
Wilco C. Peul ◽  
Maurits W. van Tulder

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. S97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Paul Steib ◽  
Jean Huppert ◽  
Thierry Dufour ◽  
Pierre Bernard ◽  
Jacques Beaurain ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo Eon Lee ◽  
Chun Kee Chung ◽  
Tae Ahn Jahng

Object The purpose of cervical total disc replacement (TDR) is to decrease the incidence of adjacent segment disease through motion preservation. Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-known complication after hip and knee arthroplasties. There are few reports regarding HO in patients undergoing cervical TDR, however; and the occurrence of HO and its effects on cervical motion have rarely been reported. Moreover, temporal progression of HO has not been fully addressed. One goal of this study involved determining the incidence of HO following cervical TDR, as identified from plain radiographs, and demonstrating the progression of HO during the follow-up period. A second goal consisted of determining whether segmental motion could be preserved and identifying the relationship between HO and clinical outcomes. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective clinical and radiological study of 28 consecutive patients who underwent cervical TDR with Mobi-C prostheses (LDR Medical) between September 2006 and October 2008. Radiological outcomes were evaluated using lateral dynamic radiographs obtained preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The occurrence of HO was interpreted on lateral radiographs using the McAfee classification. Cervical range of motion (ROM) was also measured. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were used to evaluate clinical outcome. Results The mean follow-up period was 21.6 ± 7.0 months, and the mean occurrence of HO was at 8.0 ± 6.6 months postoperatively. At the last follow-up, 18 (64.3%) of 28 patients had HO: Grade I, 6 patients; Grade II, 8 patients; Grade III, 3 patients; and Grade IV, 1 patient. Heterotopic ossification progression was proportional to the duration of follow-up; HO was present in 3 (10.7%) of 28 patients at 1 month; 7 (25.0%) of 28 patients at 3 months; 11 (42.3%) of 26 patients at 6 months; 15 (62.5%) of 24 patients at 12 months; and 17 (77.3%) of 22 patients at 24 months. Cervical ROM was preserved in Grades I and II HO but was restricted in Grades III and IV HO. Clinical improvement according to the VAS and NDI was not significantly correlated with the occurrence of HO. Conclusions The overall incidence of HO after cervical TDR was relatively high. Moreover, HO began unexpectedly to appear early after surgery. Heterotopic ossification progression was proportional to the time that had elapsed postoperatively. Grade III or IV HO can restrict the cervical ROM and may lead to spontaneous fusion; however, the occurrence of HO did not affect clinical outcome. The results of this study indicate that a high incidence of HO with the possibility of spontaneous fusion is to be expected during long-term follow-up and should be considered before performing cervical TDR.


2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsung-Hsi Tu ◽  
Jau-Ching Wu ◽  
Li-Yu Fay ◽  
Chin-Chu Ko ◽  
Wen-Cheng Huang ◽  
...  

Cervical total disc replacement (TDR) is a viable option for the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease. This 67-year-old nonsmoking male patient underwent single-level ProDisc-C cervical TDR at C5–6 without any intraoperative problem. His radicular pain improved and he had no neck pain immediately after the operation. However, on postoperative Day 3, a radiograph demonstrated a vertical split fracture of the C-5 vertebra. This fracture was managed conservatively, and 2 years postoperatively a follow-up CT scan demonstrated stable device position and fusion of the fracture. Although the linear fracture caused no neurological symptoms or device migration, the authors advocate prudence in selection and installation of keel-design prostheses, even in a single-level cervical TDR scenario.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-156
Author(s):  
Awaiz Ahmed ◽  
Abdulla Jawed ◽  
Murali Venkatesan ◽  
James Doyle

Background. Aim of this prospective study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of second generation Wallis system for degenerative lumbar disc disease. Material and methods. 25 patients underwent discectomy and insertion of Wallis system. Outcome assessment was done using Modified Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for backache and leg pain. Results. The mean follow-up was 20.5 months. The mean VAS for backache and leg pain showed significant improvement from 7.2 to 3.0 (p<0.001) and mean modified Oswestry disability index showed significant improvement from 59.1 to 24.7 (p<0.001). Only one patient (4%) underwent revision surgery for persistent pain due to granulation tissue deep to the implant. There were no other complications. Conclusion. The Wallis spine system is a safe and effective implant for treating degenerative lumbar disc disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document