The Factors Affecting the Difficulty of Percutaneous Cylindrical Electrode Placement for Spinal Cord Stimulation

2018 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. e391-e398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyohei Kin ◽  
Takashi Agari ◽  
Takao Yasuhara ◽  
Yousuke Tomita ◽  
Ken Kuwahara ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Alò ◽  
Clayton Varga ◽  
Elliot Krames ◽  
Joshua Prager ◽  
Jan Holsheimer ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan T. Villavicencio ◽  
Jean-Christophe Leveque ◽  
Linda Rubin ◽  
Ketan Bulsara ◽  
John P. Gorecki

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sarubbo ◽  
F. Latini ◽  
V. Tugnoli ◽  
R. Quatrale ◽  
E. Granieri ◽  
...  

Object. We arranged a mini-invasive surgical approach for implantation of paddle electrodes for SCS under spinal anesthesia obtaining the best paddle electrode placement and minimizing patients’ discomfort. We describe our technique supported by neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring and clinical results.Methods. 16 patients, affected by neuropathic pain underwent the implantation of paddle electrodes for spinal cord stimulation in lateral decubitus under spinal anesthesia. The paddle was introduced after flavectomy and each patient confirmed the correct distribution of paresthesias induced by intraoperative test stimulation. VAS and patients’ satisfaction rate were recorded during the followup and compared to preoperative values.Results. No patients reported discomfort during the procedure. In all cases, paresthesias coverage of the total painful region was achieved, allowing the best final electrode positioning. At the last followup (mean 36.7 months), 87.5% of the implanted patients had a good rate of satisfaction with a mean VAS score improvement of 70.5%.Conclusions. Spinal cord stimulation under spinal anesthesia allows an optimal positioning of the paddle electrodes without any discomfort for patients or neurosurgeons. The best intraoperative positioning allows a better postoperative control of pain, avoiding the risk of blind placements of the paddle or further surgery for their replacement.


Neurosurgery ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 692-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. North ◽  
Matthew G. Ewend ◽  
Michael T. Lawton ◽  
David H. Kidd ◽  
Steven Piantadosi

Abstract Spinal cord stimulation, in use for more than 20 years, has evolved into an easily implemented technique, with percutaneous methods for electrode placement. We have reviewed our experience with this technique in treating “failed back surgery syndrome,” and have assessed patient and treatment characteristics as predictors of long-term outcome. A series of 50 patients with failed back surgery syndrome (averaging 3.1 previous operations), who underwent spinal cord stimulator implantation, was interviewed by impartial third parties, at mean follow-up intervals of 2.2 years and 5.0 years. Successful outcome (at least 50% sustained relief of pain and patient satisfaction with the result) was recorded in 53% of patients at 2.2 years and in 47% of patients at 5.0 years postoperatively. Ten of 40 patients who were disabled preoperatively returned to work. Improvements in activities of daily living were recorded in most patients for most activities; loss of function was rare. Most patients reduced or eliminated analgesic intake. Statistical analysis (including univariate and multivariate logistic regression) of patient characteristics as prognostic factors showed significant advantages for female patients and for those with programmable multi-contact implanted devices. These results, in patients with postsurgical lumbar arachnoid and epidural fibrosis and without surgically remediable lesions, compare favorably with the results in two separate series of patients with failed back surgery syndrome, in whom 1) surgical lesions were diagnosed and repeated operation performed; and 2) monoradicular pain syndromes were diagnosed and dorsal root ganglionectomies peroformed at our institution. This suggests the need for further assessment of selection criteria, critical analysis of treatment outcome, and prospective study of spinal cord stimulation and alternative approaches to failed back surgery syndrome.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
Kyohei Kin ◽  
Takashi Agari ◽  
Takao Yasuhara ◽  
Tatsuya Sasaki ◽  
Atsuhiko Toyoshima ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. North ◽  
Karen Streelman ◽  
Lance Rowland ◽  
P. Jay Foreman

A patient with failed back surgery syndrome reported paresthesia in his hands and arms during a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) screening trial with a low thoracic electrode. The patient's severe thoracic stenosis necessitated general anesthesia for simultaneous decompressive laminectomy and SCS implantation for chronic use. Use of general anesthesia gave the authors the opportunity to characterize the patient's unusual distribution of paresthesia. During SCS implantation, they recorded SCS-evoked antidromic potentials at physiologically relevant amplitudes in the legs to guide electrode placement and in the arms as controls. Stimulation of the dorsal columns at T-8 evoked potentials in the legs (common peroneal nerves) and at similar thresholds, consistent with the sensation of paresthesia in the arms, in the right ulnar nerve. The authors' electrophysiological observations support observations by neuroanatomical specialists that primary afferents can descend several (in this case, at least 8) vertebral segments in the spinal cord before synapsing or ascending. This report thus confirms a physiological basis for unusual paresthesia distribution associated with thoracic SCS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document