A Systematic Review of Simulation-Based Training in Neurosurgery, Part 2: Spinal and Pediatric Surgery, Neurointerventional Radiology, and Nontechnical Skills

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. e874-e892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Adnan Patel ◽  
Abdullatif Aydin ◽  
Michael Cearns ◽  
Prokar Dasgupta ◽  
Kamran Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pediatric Surgery ◽  
Nontechnical Skills ◽  
Simulation Based

Current status of simulation-based training in pediatric surgery: A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 1884-1893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Adnan Patel ◽  
Abdullatif Aydın ◽  
Ashish Desai ◽  
Prokar Dasgupta ◽  
Kamran Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pediatric Surgery ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Simulation Based

Evaluation methods and impact of simulation-based training in pediatric surgery: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1085-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Yokoyama ◽  
Kenichi Mizunuma ◽  
Yo Kurashima ◽  
Yusuke Watanabe ◽  
Tomoko Mizota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pediatric Surgery ◽  
Evaluation Methods ◽  
Simulation Based

The Impact of Design Elements on Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Educational Outcomes in Simulation Education: Protocol for a Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Jackson ◽  
Lauren McTier ◽  
Laura A Brooks ◽  
Rochelle Wynne
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Educational Outcomes ◽  
Undergraduate Nursing Students ◽  
Design Elements ◽  
Undergraduate Nursing ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Simulation Based ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Although simulation-based education (SBE) has become increasingly popular as a mode of teaching in undergraduate nursing courses its effect on associated student learning outcomes remains ambiguous. Educational outcomes are influenced by SBE quality that is governed by technology, training, resources and SBE design elements. This paper reports the protocol for a systematic review to identify, appraise and synthesise the best available evidence regarding the impact of SBE on undergraduate nurses’ learning outcomes. Methods: Databases to be searched from 1st of January 1990 include the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), American Psychological Association (APA) PsycInfo and the Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC) via the EBSCO host platform. The Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) will be searched via the OVID platform. We will review the reference lists of relevant articles for additional citations. A combination of search terms including ‘nursing students’, ‘simulation training, ‘patient simulation’, and ‘immersive simulation’ with common Boolean operators will be used. Specific search terms will be combined with either MeSH or Emtree terms and appropriate permutations for each database. Search findings will be imported into reference management software (Endnote© Version.X9) then uploaded into Covidence where two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and retrieved full text. A third reviewer will be available to resolve conflicts and moderate consensus discussions. Quantitative primary research studies evaluating the effect of SBE on undergraduate nursing students’ educational outcomes will be included. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) will be used for quality assessment of core criteria, in addition to the Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I to assess risk of bias for randomised and non-randomised studies, respectively. Primary outcomes are any measure of knowledge, skills, or attitude. Discussion: SBE has been widely adopted by healthcare disciplines in tertiary teaching settings. This systematic review will reveal (i) the effect of SBE on learning outcomes, (ii) SBE element variability, and (iii) interplay between SBE elements and learning outcome. Findings will specify SBE design elements to inform the design and implementation of future strategies for simulation-based undergraduate nursing education.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021244530

Piloting the ISCP Surgical Skills Assessment: The Wales Deanery Experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
G Shingler ◽  
J Ansell ◽  
S Goddard ◽  
N Warren ◽  
J Torkington
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Training ◽  
Surgical Skills ◽  
Operating Theatre ◽  
Skills Assessment ◽  
Surgical Simulators ◽  
Simulation Based

The evidence for using surgical simulators in training and assessment is growing rapidly. A systematic review has demonstrated the validity of different simulators for a range of procedures. Research suggests that skills developed on simulators can be transferred to the operating theatre. The increased interest in simulation comes as a result of the need to streamline surgical training. This is reflected by the numerous simulation-based courses that have become an essential part of modern surgical training.

scholarly journals A systematic review of simulation-based training tools for technical and non-technical skills in ophthalmology

Eye ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1737-1759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne Lee ◽  
Nicholas Raison ◽  
Wai Yan Lau ◽  
Abdullatif Aydin ◽  
Prokar Dasgupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Technical Skills ◽  
Simulation Based

Non-technical skills and otolaryngology: systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 415-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Bannon ◽  
K E Stewart ◽  
M Bannister
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Technical Skills ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Skill Levels ◽  
Simulated Environments ◽  
Simulation Based ◽  
Randomised Controlled

AbstractObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the published literature on non-technical skills in otolaryngology surgery and examine the applicability of any research to others’ practice, and to explore how the published literature can identify areas for further development and guide future research.MethodsA systematic review was conducted using the following key words: ‘otolaryngology’, ‘otorhinolaryngology’, ‘ENT’, ‘ENT surgery’, ‘ear, nose and throat surgery’, ‘head and neck surgery’, ‘thyroid surgery’, ‘parathyroid surgery’, ‘otology’, ‘rhinology’, ‘laryngology’ ‘skull base surgery’, ‘airway surgery’, ‘non-technical skills’, ‘non technical skills for surgeons’, ‘NOTSS’, ‘behavioural markers’ and ‘behavioural assessment tool’.ResultsThree publications were included in the review – 1 randomised, controlled trial and 2 cohort studies – involving 78 participants. All were simulation-based studies involving training otolaryngology surgeons.ConclusionLittle research has been undertaken on non-technical skills in otolaryngology. Training surgeons’ non-technical skill levels are similar across every tested aspect. The research already performed can guide further studies, particularly amongst non-training otolaryngology surgeons and in both emergency and elective non-simulated environments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document