Current status of simulation-based training in pediatric surgery: A systematic review

The number of women entering medicine significantly increased over the last decades. Currently, over half of the medical students are women but less than half are applying to surgery and even less go on to surgical specialties. Even fewer women are seen in leadership roles throughout the profession of surgery and surgical residency. Our purpose of the literature review is to identify any themes, which would provide insight to the current phenomenon. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method for a systematic review of the literature over a 20-year period (1998–2018). Five broad themes were identified: education and recruitment, career development, impact of/on life around the globe and surgical subspecialties as areas of barriers for women entering or considering surgery. The systematic review suggests there are opportunities to improve and encourage women entering the profession of surgery as well as the quality of life for surgeons. Creating systems for mentorship across programmes, having policies to support work–life balance and recognising surgical training overlaps with childbearing years are key opportunities for improvement. Improving the current status in surgery will require direction from leadership.

Download Full-text

A Systematic Review on Current Status of Zirconia Bonding with Novel Silane Couplant for Dental Restorations

Silicon ◽

10.1007/s12633-021-01116-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

M. Senthil Kumar ◽

Gnanasekaran Sakthivel ◽

M. Vanmathi

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Current Status ◽

Dental Restorations

Download Full-text

Current status of wet lab and cadaveric simulation in urological training: A systematic review

Canadian Urological Association Journal ◽

10.5489/cuaj.6520 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 14 (11) ◽

Author(s):

Ahmed Al-Jabir ◽

Abdullatif Aydin ◽

Hussain Al-Jabir ◽

M. Shamim Khan ◽

Prokar Dasgupta ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

English Language ◽

In Vivo Studies ◽

Current Status ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Cadaveric Simulation ◽

Randomized Controlled Studies ◽

Wet Lab ◽

Urological Training

Introduction: We undertook a systematic review of the use of wet lab (animal and cadaveric) simulation models in urological training, with an aim to establishing a level of evidence (LoE) for studies and level of recommendation (LoR) for models, as well as evaluating types of validation. Methods: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for English-language studies using search terms including a combination of surgery, surgical training, and medical education. These results were combined with wet lab, animal model, cadaveric, and in-vivo. Studies were then assigned a LoE and LoR if appropriate as per the education-modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine classification. Results: A total of 43 articles met the inclusion criteria. There was a mean of 23.1 (±19.2) participants per study with a median of 20. Overall, the studies were largely of low quality, with 90.7% of studies being lower than 2a LoE (n=26 for LoE 2b and n=13 for LoE 3). The majority (72.1%, n=31) of studies were in animal models and 27.9% (n=12) were in cadaveric models. Conclusions: Simulation in urological education is becoming more prevalent in the literature, however, there is a focus on animal rather than cadaveric simulation, possibly due to cost and ethical considerations. Studies are also predominately of a low LoE; more higher LoEs, especially randomized controlled studies, are needed.

Download Full-text

Impact of crisis resource management simulation-based training for interprofessional and interdisciplinary teams: A systematic review

Journal of Interprofessional Care ◽

10.3109/13561820.2015.1017555 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 29 (5) ◽

pp. 433-444 ◽

Cited By ~ 77

Author(s):

Lillia Fung ◽

Sylvain Boet ◽

M. Dylan Bould ◽

Haytham Qosa ◽

Laure Perrier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Resource Management ◽

Interdisciplinary Teams ◽

Crisis Resource Management ◽

Simulation Based

Download Full-text

Analysis Of Factors Influencing Acupuncture Clinical Effects: A Systematic Review

Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research ◽

10.3727/036012921x16321477053935 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yali Liu ◽

Honglin Jiang ◽

Xiaotong Li ◽

Xingyue Yang

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Individual Difference ◽

Current Status ◽

Clinical Effects ◽

High Quality ◽

Psychological States ◽

Factors Influencing ◽

High Quality Evidence ◽

Stimulus Parameters ◽

Quality Evidence

Background: Acupuncture therapy has been widely applied all around the world. But there still lacks high-quality evidence to evaluate its clinical effects, safety and cost-effectiveness, which seriously restricts its further promotion and development. Acupuncture, as an operational intervention, is more complex than drug therapy. Factors involved in the acupuncture operation process, such as individual and interventional factors, may affect clinical effects. Purpose:s Through this systematic review, we attempt to analyze the current status of studies about the key factors influencing clinical effects, so as to provide evidence for the design of acupuncture studies. Methods: A literature research was conducted in six databases until May, 2020. Studies were screened and assessed by two authors independently. Data extraction was made after screening. We extracted the basic information of these studies, including publishing years and countries, population and factors influencing clinical effects.Results: Through the initial search in these six database, 6404 records were retrieved. After duplication and screening, a total of 355 studies were finally included in the qualitative analysis. About 88.5% of these studies were conducted in China with increasing number in the past decades, covering neurological disorders, orthopedic disorders, obstetrical and gynecological diseases, digestive diseases and so on; 239 studies focused on stimulus parameters which may influence effects, accounting for 67.3%, and 128, 44, 39, 32, 15, 11 studies discussed acupoints, patients’ pathological states, individual difference, psychological states, deqi, and other factors separately. Conclusion: There are more and more studies focusing on factors influencing acupuncture clinical effects, including stimulus parameters, acupoints, individual difference, patient pathological and psychological states. Based on this systematic review, several ignored factors should be considered for future researches, and more scientifically and objectively high quality evidence should also be proved.

Download Full-text

Influential Factors for Older Users’ Acceptance of eHealth Services: an Integrated Acceptance Framework (IAF) (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.31920 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Jiyeon Yu ◽

Angelica de Antonio ◽

Elena Villalba-Mora

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Older Adults ◽

New Technologies ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Health Condition ◽

Influential Factors ◽

Current Status ◽

Five Dimensions ◽

The Impact ◽

Acceptance Factors

BACKGROUND eHealth and Telehealth play a crucial role in assisting older adults who visit hospitals frequently or who live in nursing homes and can benefit from staying at home while being cared for. Adapting to new technologies can be difficult for older people. Thus, to better apply these technologies to older adults’ lives, many studies have analyzed acceptance factors for this particular population. However, there is not yet a consensual framework to be used in further development and the search for solutions. OBJECTIVE This paper presents an Integrated Acceptance Framework (IAF) for the older user’s acceptance of eHealth, based on 43 studies selected through a systematic review. METHODS We conducted a four-step study. First, through a systematic review from 2010 to 2020 in the field of eHealth, the acceptance factors and basic data for analysis were extracted. Second, we carried out a thematic analysis to group the factors into themes to propose and integrated framework for acceptance. Third, we defined a metric to evaluate the impact of the factors addressed in the studies. Last, the differences amongst the important IAF factors were analyzed, according to the participants’ health conditions, verification time, and year. RESULTS Through the systematic review, 731 studies were founded in 5 major databases, resulting in 43 selected studies using the PRISMA methodology. First, the research methods and the acceptance factors for eHealth were compared and analyzed, extracting a total of 105 acceptance factors, which were grouped later, resulting in the Integrated Acceptance Framework. Five dimensions (i.e., personal, user-technology relational, technological, service-related, environmental) emerged with a total of 23 factors. Also, we assessed the quality of the evidence. And then, we conducted a stratification analysis to reveal the more appropriate factors depending on the health condition and the assessment time. Finally, we assess which are the factors and dimensions that are recently becoming more important. CONCLUSIONS The result of this investigation is a framework for conducting research on eHealth acceptance. To elaborately analyze the impact of the factors of the proposed framework, the criteria for evaluating the evidence from the studies that have extracted factors are presented. Through this process, the impact of each factor in the IAF has been presented, in addition to the framework proposal. Moreover, a meta-analysis of the current status of research is presented, highlighting the areas where specific measures are needed to facilitate e-Health acceptance.

Download Full-text