scholarly journals Women, Weather, and Woes: The Triangular Dynamics of Female-Headed Households, Economic Vulnerability, and Climate Variability in South Africa

2017 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 41-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Flatø ◽  
Raya Muttarak ◽  
André Pelser
2021 ◽  
pp. 003072702110049
Author(s):  
Mashudu Tshikovhi ◽  
Roscoe Bertrum van Wyk

This study examines the impact of increasing climate variability on food production in South Africa, focusing on maize and wheat yields. A two-way fixed effects panel regression model was used to assess the climate variability impacts, analysing secondary data for the period 2000 to 2019 for nine provinces in South Africa. The study found that increasing climate variability has a negative impact on maize and wheat production in South Africa. Specifically, the results indicated a negative correlation between mean annual temperature with both maize and wheat yields. A decrease in precipitation affected maize yields negatively, while the impact on wheat yields was positive, although insignificant. This analysis, therefore, depicted that crop yields generally increase with more annual precipitation and decrease with higher temperatures. The study recommends that funding initiatives to educate farmers on increasing climate variability and its effects on farming activities in South Africa should be prioritised.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1963-1971
Author(s):  
Karen Lebek ◽  
Cornelius Senf ◽  
David Frantz ◽  
José A. F. Monteiro ◽  
Tobias Krueger

Author(s):  
Maropene Tebello Rapholo ◽  
Lawrence Diko Makia

Purpose Literature contends that not much is known about smallholder farmers’ perceptions of climate variability and the impacts thereof on agricultural practices in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa in particular. The purpose of this study is to examine the perceptions of smallholder farmers from Botlokwa (a semi-arid region in South Africa) on climate variability in relation to climatological evidence. Design/methodology/approach The study area is in proximity to a meteorological station and comprises mainly rural farmers, involved in rain-fed subsistence agriculture. Focus group discussions and closed-ended questionnaires covering demographics and perceptions were administered to 125 purposely sampled farmers. To assess farmers’ perceptions of climate variability, their responses were compared with linear trend and variability of historical temperature and rainfall data (1985-2015). Descriptive statistics were used to provide insights into respondents’ perceptions. Findings About 64% of the farmers perceived climate variability that was consistent with the meteorological data, whereas 36% either held contrary observations or were unable to discern. Age, level of education, farming experience and accessibility to information influenced the likelihood of farmers to correctly perceive climate variability. No significant differences in perception based on gender were observed. This study concludes that coping and adaption strategies of over one-third of the farmers could be negatively impacted by wrong perceptions of climate variability. Originality/value This study highlights discrepancies in perceptions among farmers with similar demographic characteristics. To guarantee sustainability of the sector, intervention by government and other key stakeholders to address underlying factors responsible for observed discrepancies is recommended.


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 921-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen C. Power ◽  
Apurva Goyal

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 155-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Mastrorillo ◽  
Rachel Licker ◽  
Pratikshya Bohra-Mishra ◽  
Giorgio Fagiolo ◽  
Lyndon D. Estes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document