Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is less costly than primary debulking surgery for treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer in patients≥65years old

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with those treated conventionally with primary debulking surgery. From 1994 to 2003, all consecutive cases of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated with NACT at the University of Bari were identified. A well-balanced group of women who underwent primary debulking surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy was selected as controls. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine the predictors for survival. Thirty women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma were treated with NACT and compared to 30 patients who underwent primary debulking surgery. Patients in the NACT were significantly older and had a poorer performance status compared to the controls. However, no statistical difference was observed in overall disease-specific survival (P = 0.66) and disease-free survival (P = 0.25) between the two groups. Although patients in the NACT group are significantly older and have a poorer performance status, this treatment modality does not compromise survival. Prospective randomized trials comparing NACT to conventional treatment to determine the quality of life and cost/benefit outcomes are now appropriate for women presenting advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Download Full-text

Advanced stage ovarian cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy suffered worse recurrence free survival

10.21203/rs.2.20542/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Cailiang Wu ◽

Xuexin Zhou ◽

Yiwen Feng ◽

Yi Miao ◽

Ye Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Recurrence Free Survival ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Debulking Surgery ◽

Fallopian Tube Cancer ◽

Free Survival ◽

Primary Peritoneal Cancer ◽

Peritoneal Cancer ◽

Primary Debulking Surgery

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been applied for the treatment of patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer, as these patients have a low likelihood of achieving optimal debulking and are thus poor surgical candidates. Herein, we explore the effects of NACT and compare the surgical outcomes and recurrence data in patients who receive interval debulking surgery followed NACT(NACT-IDS) or primary debulking surgery(PDS). Methods A retrospective, single-center, observational study was conducted. Patients with advanced-stage EOC, fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal cancer who were treated with NACT or primary debulking surgery were enrolled. The effects of NACT as well as the surgical outcomes and recurrence data were compared between the NACT-IDS and PDS groups. Results The albumin level was elevated (42.61±3.46 g/L vs. 37.47±5.42 g/L, P=0.001) and the levels of CA12-5 and HE4 significantly decreased (P=0.002, 0.003) in patients after neoadjuvant courses. The operation time, amount of blood loss during surgery, rate of bowel resection, time to chemotherapy, and platinum-free interval were comparable between the two groups (P＞0.05). Recurrence-free survival was worse in the NACT-IDS group than in the PDS group (HR=2.406, 95% CI[1.024, 5.657]). Conclusion NACT improved the condition of advanced-stage patients, but a poor recurrence free survival rate was observed; thus, NACT should not be applied in non-selected patients.

Download Full-text