Design and implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for gynecologic oncology patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
J. Ricciuti ◽  
M. Courtney-Brooks ◽  
L. Hand ◽  
S. Mansuria ◽  
J. Holder-Murray ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1235-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Miralpeix ◽  
Gemma Mancebo ◽  
Sonia Gayete ◽  
Marta Corcoy ◽  
Josep-Maria Solé-Sedeño

Patients undergoing major surgery are predisposed to a decrease in functional capacity as a response to surgical stress that can delay post-operative recovery. A prehabilitation program consists of patient preparation strategies before surgery, and include pre-operative measures to improve functional capacity and enhance post-operative recovery. Multimodal prehabilitation may include exercise, nutritional counseling, psychological support, and optimization of underlying medical conditions, as well as cessation of unfavorable health behaviors such as smoking and drinking. Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for prehabilitation, and the existent studies are heterogeneous; however, multimodal approaches are likely to have a greater impact on functional outcomes than single management programs. We have reviewed the literature on prehabilitation in general, and in gynecologic surgery in particular, to identify tools to establish an optimal prehabilitation program within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for gynecologic oncology patients. We suggest a safe, reproducible, functional, and easy-to-apply multimodal prehabilitation program for gynecologic oncology practice based on patient-tailored pre-operative medical optimization, physical training, nutritional counseling, and psychological support. The analysis of the prehabilitation program implementation in an ERAS protocol should undergo further research in order to test the efficacy on surgical outcome and recovery after surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 116 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basile Pache ◽  
Martin Hübner ◽  
Jonas Jurt ◽  
Nicolas Demartines ◽  
Fabian Grass

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 65S-69S
Author(s):  
Jason I. Liounakos ◽  
Michael Y. Wang

Study Design: Review. Objectives: To review the current state of endoscopic spine surgery with regard to discectomy, interbody fusion, and combination with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs in order to evaluate its relevance to the future of spine care. Methods: A review of the literature and expert opinion is used to accomplish the objectives. Results: The greatest strength of endoscopic spine surgery lies in its adherence to the basic tenets of minimally invasive surgery and its innate compatibility with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs, which aim to improve outcomes and reduce health care costs. The greatest challenge faced is the unique surgical skill set and significant learning curve. Conclusions: Endoscopic spine surgery strives to achieve the core goals of minimally invasive surgery, while reducing cost and enhancing quality. In a healthcare market that is becoming increasingly burdened by cost and regulatory constraints, the utilization of endoscopy may become more widespread in the coming years.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document