An enhanced recovery pathway decreases length of hospital stay in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery

ObjectivesTo evaluate the current patterns of use of minimally invasive surgical procedures, including traditional, robotic-assisted, and single-port laparoscopy, by Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members and to compare the results to those of our 2004 and 2007 surveys.MethodsThe Society of Gynecologic Oncology members were surveyed through an online or mailed-paper survey. Data were analyzed and compared with results of our prior surveys.ResultsFour hundred six (32%) of 1279 SGO members responded. Eighty-three percent of respondents (n = 337) performed traditional laparoscopic surgery (compared with 84% in 2004 and 91% in 2007). Ninety-seven percent of respondents performed robotic surgery (compared with 27% in 2007). When respondents were asked to indicate procedures that they performed with the robot but not with traditional laparoscopy, 75% indicated radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Overall, 70% of respondents indicated that hysterectomy and staging for uterine cancer was the procedure they most commonly performed with a minimally invasive approach. Only 17% of respondents who performed minimally invasive surgery performed single-port laparoscopy, and only 5% of respondents indicated that single-port laparoscopy has an important or very important role in the field.ConclusionsSince our prior surveys, we found a significant increase in the overall use and indications for robotic surgery. Radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer and total hysterectomy and staging for endometrial cancer were procedures found to be significantly more appropriate for the robotic platform in comparison to traditional laparoscopy. The indications for laparoscopy have expanded beyond endometrial cancer staging to include surgical management of early-stage cervical and ovarian cancers, but the use of single-port laparoscopy remains limited.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology ◽

10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.005 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 24 (1) ◽

pp. 48-54 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Deanna Teoh ◽

Rebi Nahum Halloway ◽

Jennifer Heim ◽

Rachel Isaksson Vogel ◽

Colleen Rivard

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Invasive Surgery ◽

Gynecologic Oncology ◽

Risk Calculator ◽

Improvement Program ◽

Surgical Quality ◽

Surgical Risk ◽

American College Of Surgeons

Download Full-text

Minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery programmes in colorectal disease

Colorectal Surgery ◽

10.1016/b978-0-7020-4965-1.00017-2 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 269-288

Author(s):

Ian Jenkins ◽

Robin Kennedy

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Invasive Surgery ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Colorectal Disease

Download Full-text

Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery program in gynecology: are all items of equal importance?

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1136/ijgc-2019-000268 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 29 (4) ◽

pp. 810-815 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Basile Pache ◽

Jonas Jurt ◽

Fabian Grass ◽

Martin Hübner ◽

Nicolas Demartines ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Gynecologic Oncology ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Gynecologic Surgery ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Prolonged Length ◽

Academic Center ◽

The Impact

IntroductionEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines in gynecologic surgery are a set of multiple recommendations based on the best available evidence. However, according to previous studies, maintaining high compliance is challenging in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of compliance to individual ERAS items on clinical outcomes.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database of 446 consecutive women undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery (both open and minimally invasive) within an ERAS program from 1 October 2013 until 31 January 2017 in a tertiary academic center in Switzerland. Demographics, adherence, and outcomes were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression was performed, with adjustment for confounding factors. Main outcomes were overall compliance, compliance to each individual ERAS item, and impact on post-operative complications according to Clavien classification.ResultsA total of 446 patients were included, 26.2 % (n=117) had at least one complication (Clavien I–V), and 11.4 % (n=51) had a prolonged length of hospital stay. The single independent risk factor for overall complications was intra-operative blood loss > 200 mL (OR 3.32; 95% CI 1.6 to 6.89, p=0.001). Overall compliance >70% with ERAS items (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.66, p=0.12) showed a protective effect on complications. Increased compliance was also associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.435 to 0.93, p=0.001).ConclusionsCompliance >70% with modifiable ERAS items was significantly associated with reduced overall complications. Best possible compliance with all ERAS items is the goal to achieve lower complication rates after gynecologic oncology surgery.

Download Full-text