Delivery of gynecologic oncology care: Optimizing scope of advanced practice providers to enhance patient care: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology Position Paper

2018 ◽  
Vol 151 (3) ◽  
pp. 494-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne K. Rash ◽  
Karen D. Lyle ◽  
Arati Jairam-Thodla ◽  
Yevgeniya Ioffe
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. e518-e532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suanna S. Bruinooge ◽  
Todd A. Pickard ◽  
Wendy Vogel ◽  
Amy Hanley ◽  
Caroline Schenkel ◽  
...  

Purpose: Advanced practice providers (APPs, which include nurse practitioners [NPs] and physician assistants [PAs]) are integral members of oncology teams. This study aims first to identify all oncology APPs and, second, to understand personal and practice characteristics (including compensation) of those APPs. Methods: We identified APPs who practice oncology from membership and claims data. We surveyed 3,055 APPs about their roles in clinical care. Results: We identified at least 5,350 APPs in oncology and an additional 5,400 who might practice oncology. Survey respondents totaled 577, which provided a 19% response rate. Results focused on 540 NPs and PAs. Greater than 90% reported satisfaction with career choice. Respondents identified predominately as white (89%) and female (94%). NPs and PAs spent the majority (80%) of time in direct patient care. The top four patient care activities were patient counseling (NPs, 94%; PAs, 98%), prescribing (NPs, 93%; PAs, 97%), treatment management (NPs, 89%; PAs, 93%), and follow-up visits (NPs, 81%; PAs, 86%). A majority of all APPs reported both independent and shared visits (65% hematology/oncology/survivorship/prevention/pediatric hematology/oncology; 85% surgical/gynecologic oncology; 78% radiation oncology). A minority of APPs reported that they conducted only shared visits. Average annual compensation was between $113,000 and $115,000, which is approximately $10,000 higher than average pay for nononcology APPs. Conclusion: We identified 5,350 oncology APPs and conclude that number may be as high as 7,000. Survey results suggest that practices that incorporate APPs routinely rely on them for patient care. Given the increasing number of patients with and survivors of cancer, APPs are important to ensure access to quality cancer care now and in the future.


2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Treeby

ABSTRACTRadiographers are undertaking roles that are a development and extension of what has traditionally been seen as their remit. As with any development, it is important that such changes in practise have a positive rather than negative effect on patient care and patient experience. This article examines patient perception and level of patient satisfaction of an ‘on-treatment review’ conducted by a site-specific advanced practitioner radiographer instead of an oncology doctor. Overall, the results were positive suggesting that such reviews, when conducted by an appropriately trained individual, can enhance patient care and provide a satisfactory level of support during treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. S305-S306
Author(s):  
Benjamin Margolis ◽  
Sarah Lee ◽  
Danial Ceasar ◽  
Pooja Venkatesh ◽  
Kevin Espino ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 001857872110323
Author(s):  
Shayna Cruz ◽  
Amberene Daya ◽  
Andrea Quinn ◽  
Amanda Ries

According to the Joint Commission every patient has a right to pain management. Due to multimodal pain management, pain orders have the potential for duplication as well as gaps in therapy. At our institution, we evaluated pain orders and implemented strategies that aimed to reduce those gaps. We found that current ordering practices permitted the use of varying visual analog scale (VAS) ranges (e.g., VAS 1-3 and 1-5) which inherently increased the potential for duplicate therapies. When gaps in therapy occurred, medication orders for corresponding VAS scores were not available and thus, therapy was delayed. Additionally, current administration policies did not take into account patient preferences for less potent agents which can also cause a delay in care. In summary, simple strategies, discussed in this article, may be implemented at the hospital level to optimize patient care while maintaining recommendations by the Joint Commission for clear medication orders.


2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith ◽  
Daniella Pena ◽  
Emily Ko

Author(s):  
Sandeep Bhatti ◽  
Rachel Brown ◽  
Orla Macdonald ◽  
Dan White

The roles of the clinical pharmacists and medicines management technicians within the inpatient psychiatric setting are many and varied. This chapter explores some of these roles and examines how they enhance patient care and support the aims of mental health trusts and inpatient psychiatry. This is primarily achieved through effectively and efficiently managing medicines. The aim of the clinical pharmacy team is to promote high-quality, value-for-money care which is patient-centred and based upon improving patient outcomes. The chapter also discusses how pivotal papers and reports have shaped the services that pharmacy departments deliver to psychiatric inpatients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 470-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa K. Frey ◽  
Rana K. Fowlkes ◽  
Nora M. Badiner ◽  
David Fishman ◽  
Margaux Kanis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document