Reassessment of the classification of the Order Haplosclerida (Class Demospongiae, Phylum Porifera) using 18S rRNA gene sequence data

2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 344-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.E. Redmond ◽  
R.W.M. van Soest ◽  
M. Kelly ◽  
J. Raleigh ◽  
S.A.A. Travers ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 396-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nielson T. Baxter ◽  
Judy J. Wan ◽  
Alyxandria M. Schubert ◽  
Matthew L. Jenior ◽  
Philip Myers ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTUsing populations of two sympatricPeromyscusspecies, we characterized the importance of the host species, physiology, environment, diet, and other factors in shaping the structure and dynamics of their gut microbiota. We performed a capture-mark-release experiment in which we obtained 16S rRNA gene sequence data from 49 animals at multiple time points. In addition, we performed 18S rRNA gene sequencing of the same samples to characterize the diet of each individual. Our analysis could not distinguish between the two species ofPeromyscuson the basis of the structures of their microbiotas. However, we did observe a set of bacterial populations that were found in every animal. Most notable were abundant representatives of the generaLactobacillusandHelicobacter. When we combined the 16S and 18S rRNA gene sequence analyses, we were unable to distinguish the communities on the basis of the animal's diet. Furthermore, there were no discernible differences in the structure of the gut communities based on the capture site or their developmental or physiological status. Finally, in contrast to humans, where each individual has a unique microbiota when sampled over years, among the animals captured in this study, the uniqueness of each microbiota was lost within a week of the original sampling. Wild populations provide an opportunity to study host-microbiota interactions as they originally evolved, and the ability to perform natural experiments will facilitate a greater understanding of the factors that shape the structure and function of the gut microbiota.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanos Banos ◽  
Guillaume Lentendu ◽  
Anna Kopf ◽  
Tesfaye Wubet ◽  
Frank Oliver Glöckner ◽  
...  

Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified that three of the primer names identified as most promising candidates for fungal community surveys were incorrectly renamed following the primer nomenclature system proposed by Gargas & DePriest [2].


2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 493-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Henson ◽  
Sharon M. Hesselbrock ◽  
Linda E. Watson ◽  
Susan R. Barnum

The heterocystous cyanobacteria are currently placed in subsections IV and V, which are distinguished by cellular division in one plane (false branching) and in more than one plane (true branching), respectively. Published phylogenies of 16S rRNA gene sequence data support the monophyly of the heterocystous cyanobacteria, with members of subsection V embedded within subsection IV. It has been postulated that members of subsection V arose from within subsection IV. Therefore, phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences of the nitrogen-fixation gene nifD from representatives of subsections IV and V was performed by using maximum-likelihood criteria. The heterocystous cyanobacteria are supported as being monophyletic, with the non-heterocystous cyanobacteria as their closest relative. However, neither subsection IV nor subsection V is monophyletic, with representatives of both subsections intermixed in two sister clades. Analysis of nifD does not support recognition of two distinct subsections.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document