Clinical Results of Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large, Active Surveillance Cohort With Localized Prostate Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 102-103
Author(s):  
C.A. Lawton
Author(s):  
Niranjan Sathianathen

This chapter provides a summary of an important observational study of men with clinically localized, mostly favorable-risk prostate cancer who were followed with active surveillance, which consisted of periodic prostate-specific antigen testing and repeat biopsies. It found that local treatment with curative intent can be safely deferred long term in many patients as long as they are carefully monitored.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suneil Jain ◽  
Danny Vesprini ◽  
Alexandre Mamedov ◽  
D. Andrew Loblaw ◽  
Laurence Klotz

1 Background: Active surveillance (AS) is an accepted management strategy for localized prostate cancer. However, the rate of pathological upgrading has not been well described in mature study cohorts. Furthermore, concern exists over the possibility of prostate cancer dedifferentiation with time in patients on AS. Methods: Patients in our prospectively collected AS database with at least one repeat prostate biopsy were included. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the proportion of patients upgraded (Gleason 6 to 3+4 or higher, Gleason 3+4 to 4+3 or higher) with time from diagnostic biopsy. Results: 593 of 862 patients in our cohort had at least one repeat biopsy. Median follow-up was 6.4 years (max. 20.2 years). The total number of biopsies ranged from 2 to 6. 20% of patients were intermediate risk, 0.3 % high risk, all others low risk. 31.2% of patients were upgraded during active surveillance. The proportion of patients upgraded increased with time, suggesting prostate cancer dedifferentiation occurred at a rate of 1.0%/year (95%CI -0.12 to 2.16%/year). The estimated rate of increase was 2.5 times higher in patients with intermediate risk disease at diagnosis (rate 1.9%/year, 95%CI -0.7-4.6) compared with those with low risk disease (rate 0.75%/year, 95%CI -0.5-2.0). Further analysis is underway. 62% of upgraded patients (n=114) went on to have active treatment. Patients who were upgraded and treated had significantly greater PSA velocities (median 1.2 ng/ml/y vs 0.42 ng/ml/y, p=0.01) and significantly higher Gleason scores when upgraded, than those who remained on surveillance (21.8% vs 2.8% Gleason 8-10, p<0.01). Conclusions: This is the largest re-biopsy cohort, with long-term follow-up, described to date, enabling the first estimates of prostate cancer dedifferentiation in patients on AS. Dedifferentiation rates appear higher in patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer compared with those who are low risk at baseline.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 68-68
Author(s):  
J. Coen ◽  
J. J. Paly ◽  
E. A. Weyman ◽  
A. Rodrigues ◽  
W. U. Shipley ◽  
...  

68 Background: High-dose conformal proton radiation for localized prostate cancer results in favorable clinical outcomes and low toxicity rates. Here, we report long-term quality of life (QOL) outcome for men treated with conformal protons. Methods: Serial QOL questionnaires were administered to men who received proton radiation. Long-term questionnaires (minimum 2 years) were completed by 72 patients. Men were stratified into functional groups from their baseline questionnaires (normal, intermediate or poor function) for each symptom domain. Symptom scores were calculated at baseline and long-term follow-up and expressed as mean values. QOL changes were assessed overall and within functional groups in a paired fashion using the Student's t-test. Results: The median age at treatment and follow-up were 66 years and 44 months, respectively. The median dose was 82 GyE (range 74-82 GyE). For all 72 patients, there were increased scores for incontinence (ID) (3.2 baseline vs. 9.9 long-term, p=<0.001), obstructive/irritative voiding (OID; 20 vs. 24, p=0.028), bowel (BD; 4.4 vs. 8.0, p=0.001) and sexual dysfunction (SD; 25 vs. 48, p<0.001). When stratified by functional category, more specific estimates were possible. For ID, only normal function was associated with a significant increased score (0 vs. 8.4 at baseline and long-term, p=<0.001); for OID, only the group with normal baseline function showed a significant increased score (12 vs. 17, p=0.01); similarly for BD, only men with normal function had a significant increased score (0 vs. 5.4, p<0.001). For SD, the score increased in men with normal (1.4 vs. 30, p<0.001) and intermediate function (17 vs. 46, p<0.001). Conclusions: Patient reported outcomes are sensitive indicators of treatment related sequelae and here quantitate, for the first time, the long-term consequences of proton monotherapy for prostate cancer. Analysis by baseline functional category is a useful means of predicting long-term QOL scores for an individual patient. High-dose proton radiation was associated with small increases in bowel dysfunction, obstructive/irritative voiding dysfunction and incontinence. With long term follow-up, sexual dysfunction increased more than any other symptom domain. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Author(s):  
Philipp Dahm

This chapter provides a summary of the landmark PIVOT trial that randomized men with clinically localized prostate cancer from the early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era to radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting. Based on long-term follow-up, the study found that surgery provided only small reductions in disease-specific survival but caused substantial side effects. It suggested that many men with clinically localized prostate cancer fare well with watchful waiting.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomás Merino ◽  
Ignacio F San Francisco ◽  
Pablo A Rojas ◽  
Piero Bettoli ◽  
Álvaro Zúñiga ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document