scholarly journals Double jeopardy: Predictors of elevated lethality risk among intimate partner violence victims seen in emergency departments

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Brignone ◽  
Anu Manchikanti Gomez
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Craig Dodge ◽  
Elizabeth McLoughlin ◽  
Linda E. Saltzman ◽  
Gregory Nah ◽  
Peggy Skaj ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharti Khurana ◽  
Denise A. Hines ◽  
Benjamin A. Johnson ◽  
Elizabeth A. Bates ◽  
Nicola Graham‐Kevan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 801-806
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Katsos ◽  
Emmanouil I Sakelliadis ◽  
Eleni Zorba ◽  
Artemis Tsitsika ◽  
Stavroula Papadodima ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a well-known phenomenon, which affects mostly women. While IPV victims may attend emergency departments (EDs) seeking medical care, not all of them will make an allegation against their abusers. Objective The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and the characteristics of the victims, who had made an allegation about the violent incident and had been examined by a forensic pathologist for judicial purposes, and had attended EDs seeking medical care, before the forensic examination. Methods We reviewed the archives of clinical examinations that were conducted at the Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens during a 5-year period (2012–16). Results Six hundred sixty-four clinical examinations were conducted at our Department for IPV allegations. According to our findings, women were more likely to seek medical care than men. Victims who have attended EDs were more likely to have sustained injuries located at least on the head or on the lower limbs. Conclusion The majority of IPV victims in the broader region of Attica (Greece) were women, usually married, and aged between 30 and 49 years old. Despite the fact that the majority of IPV incidents are not reported to police, every person who is engaged in the process of dealing with IPV victims has to be educated and adequately informed about this phenomenon, its implications and the possible ways to deal with it. Furthermore, victims need to be educated and informed adequately in waiting rooms of EDs.


CJEM ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 325-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah McClennan ◽  
Andrew Worster ◽  
Harriet MacMillan

ABSTRACTObjective:We sought to determine the proportion of Canadian emergency departments (EDs) that have intimate partner violence (IPV) universal screening programs and intervention policies and procedures. Of the EDs with programs, we determined what proportion had made changes in their practices during the past 10 years and since the 2003 Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care recommendations.Methods:Using the same sampling methods as a 1994 study, we mailed questionnaires to nurse managers of a stratified, random sample of 250 out of 638 (39%) Canadian EDs and followed up with a series of telephone calls.Results:Of the 250 EDs initially contacted, 6 were excluded before the surveys were mailed. The response rate was 78.3% (191/244). Sixty-one (31.9%) of the studied EDs reported the existence of IPV policies and procedures. In this group, 26 (42.6%) applied universal screening and 13 (21.3%) implemented their screening policies after the 2003 national recommendations were published. When these results were compared with those of the 1994 study, there was no difference in the proportion of EDs with IPV policies and procedures or in the proportion of EDs that applied universal screening.Conclusion:Despite increased research into IPV there was no significant change between 1994 and 2004 in the existence of IPV polices or universal screening in Canadian EDs. Policies and procedures that address appropriate responses to patients exposed to IPV should be a priority, with most emphasis directed toward developing effective interventions to which women can be referred.


2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052110220
Author(s):  
Bharti Khurana ◽  
Randall T. Loder

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health issue and occurs in intimate relationships regardless of age or sexual orientation. Several studies, most of them relying on small-scale samples, have explored the prevalence and risk factors of IPV in older adults. Still, none have focused on the demographics and injury patterns in older adult victims. Using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) All Injury Program (AIP) data, we performed a retrospective analysis from 2005 through 2015 of the demographics and injuries of older adult IPV patients (>60 years old) presenting to emergency departments (EDs) compared to younger adult IPV patients (<60 years old). IPV accounted for 2,059,441 ED visits (.61%) with 37,534 (1.8%) visits in the older adults. Older adults were more frequently male (36.1% vs 16.8%), White (65.3% vs 52.8%), sustained fewer neck/head injuries (47.6% vs 59.4%), fewer contusions/abrasions (34.6% vs 47.2%), had more trunk fractures (38.4% vs 11.9%), trunk strains/sprains (39.5% vs 15.4%) and more hospital admissions (15.7 vs 4.2%), compared to younger IPV patients. Within the older adult cohort, females were more commonly White (71.2% vs 56.0%) while males were more commonly Black (36.3% vs 19.0%). Injuries in older adult males were more commonly lacerations (40.6% vs 14.2%%) and less commonly contusions/abrasions (33.8% vs 43.5%) compared to elderly females. Older adult females had more internal organ injuries than older adult males (18.9% vs 12.9%) and nearly all involved the head. Knowledge of these injury patterns in older adults can equip the health care providers when to be more suspicious of unexplained or suspicious injuries as the victim’s symptoms at the presentation might not be directly related to violence.


2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca K. Yau ◽  
Catherine D. Stayton ◽  
Leslie L. Davidson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document