Mooren's Ulcer and Evidence of Stromal Graft Rejection After Penetrating Keratoplasty

1992 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 412-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Gottsch ◽  
Sammy H. Liu ◽  
Walter J. Stark
1987 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartly J. Mondino ◽  
John D. Hofbauer ◽  
Robert Y. Foos

1980 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart I. Brown ◽  
Bartly J. Mondino

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212090976
Author(s):  
Marta Jerez-Peña ◽  
Borja Salvador-Culla ◽  
María F de la Paz ◽  
Rafael I Barraquer

Introduction: Mooren’s ulcer is a painful, inflammatory chronic keratitis that affects corneal periphery, progressing centripetally, ultimately ending in perforation. The first line of treatment includes systemic immunomodulators, with surgery being the last option. We present a case of bilateral Boston keratoprosthesis implantation for severe Mooren’s ulcer that responded differently in each eye. Clinical case: A 32-year-old male with corneal opacification, anterior staphylomas, vision of hand movement, was started on systemic immunosuppression with cyclosporine. After two failed penetrating keratoplasties in each eye, high intraocular pressure despite diode cyclophotocoagulation, and cystic macular edema, we performed Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 in both eyes. The right eye responded initially well, with a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/80 and normal intraocular pressure. The left eye presented high intraocular pressure, which required cyclophotocoagulation, ultimately resulting in hypotony. Boston keratoprosthesis was performed but had peripheral corneal necrosis that progressed despite amniotic membrane transplantation and aggressive intensive treatment with medroxyprogesterone, autologous platelet-rich-in-growth-factors eye drops, and oral doxycycline. Thus, replacement of the semi-exposed Boston keratoprosthesis with tectonic penetrating keratoplasty was necessary. However, both eyes developed phthisis bulbi with final visual acuity of perception of light with poor localization. Conclusion: Mainstay treatment of Mooren’s ulcer is systemic immunomodulation. Surgical treatment must be considered only when risk of perforation, preferably with inflammation under control. Penetrating keratoplasty frequently fails, and Boston keratoprosthesis may be a viable option. However, postoperative complications, especially uncontrolled high intraocular pressure, corneal necrosis, and recurrence of Mooren’s ulcer may jeopardize the outcomes and need to be addressed promptly with intensive topical and systemic treatment.


Author(s):  
Sonja Heinzelmann ◽  
Daniel Böhringer ◽  
Philip Christian Maier ◽  
Berthold Seitz ◽  
Claus Cursiefen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) gets more and more reserved to cases of increasing complexity. In such cases, ocular comorbidities may limit graft survival following PK. A major cause for graft failure is endothelial graft rejection. Suture removal is a known risk factor for graft rejection. Nevertheless, there is no evidence-based regimen for rejection prophylaxis following suture removal. Therefore, a survey of rejection prophylaxis was conducted at 7 German keratoplasty centres. Objective The aim of the study was documentation of the variability of medicinal aftercare following suture removal in Germany. Methods Seven German keratoplasty centres with the highest numbers for PK were selected. The centres were sent a survey consisting of half-open questions. The centres performed a mean of 140 PK in 2018. The return rate was 100%. The findings were tabulated. Results All centres perform a double-running cross-stitch suture for standard PK, as well as a treatment for rejection prophylaxis with topical steroids after suture removal. There are differences in intensity (1 – 5 times daily) and tapering (2 – 20 weeks) of the topical steroids following suture removal. Two centres additionally use systemic steroids for a few days. Discussion Rejection prophylaxis following PK is currently poorly standardised and not evidence-based. All included centres perform medical aftercare following suture removal. It is assumed that different treatment strategies show different cost-benefit ratios. In the face of the diversity, a systematic analysis is required to develop an optimised regimen for all patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 108509
Author(s):  
Hao Chi ◽  
Wenpei Hao ◽  
Xia Qi ◽  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Yanling Dong ◽  
...  

1921 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Feingold

2008 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
J R Zelefsky ◽  
C J Taylor ◽  
M Srinivasan ◽  
S Peacock ◽  
R S Goodman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document