Size-dependent predation risk and partner quality in predator inspection of sticklebacks

1992 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 949-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Külling ◽  
Manfred Milinski
1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 1878-1884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward P Levri

Foraging behavior can be influenced by such factors as predation risk, individual size, and parasite infection. Snails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) placed in tanks with large rocks were exposed to four types of water: (1) water with crushed snails, (2) water from a tank in which fish (Gobiomorphus cotidianus) were fed only trout chow, (3) water from a tank where the fish were also fed snails, and (4) plain water. Snails could respond by moving to the top of rocks (where algal food was present) or to the bottom of rocks (where the predation risk was lower). The snails responded to fish chemicals by moving to the bottom of rocks. The response was dependent on snail size and fish diet. Smaller snails moved to the bottom of rocks more than larger snails did. Trematode-infected snails were found on top of the rocks more than other classes of snails, but infected snails still moved to the bottom of rocks in response to the fish predator. Snails eaten by fish in the field tend to be smaller than snails in the overall available population. Thus, snails that are more vulnerable to predation respond more intensely to the odor of fish by moving to the bottom of rocks. This size-dependent response to fish appears to be independent of the occurrence of trematode infection.


Oikos ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pär Byström ◽  
Jens Andersson ◽  
Lennart Persson ◽  
André M. De Roos

1997 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 1642-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich G. Reinhardt ◽  
Michael C. Healey

Foraging and use of cover by juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) were affected by predation threat in both seminatural channels and laboratory streams. In the field, coho salmon preferred stream sections with brushy cover only when under threat from hunting common mergansers. The mergansers had their highest capture success in pools without cover. Predation threat also caused coho salmon to use cover more as foraging habitat and to aggregate more in favourable positions at the head of the pool. In the laboratory, under simulated predation threat, fish using a refuge were significantly larger than those in the risky habitat. This pattern persisted for 2 days after the predation threat was discontinued. The average growth of coho salmon under predation threat was depressed and the difference in growth between large and small individuals was less than in control groups. We argue that larger fish were more averse to predation risk than smaller fish and that the smaller fish took advantage of feeding opportunities indirectly provided as a result of the predation risk. We speculate that in natural environments, predation may depress growth rates because of risk-avoidance behaviour but may also serve to reduce growth-rate differences among size classes within a cohort.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document