Anatomical reconstruction of aorta and pulmonary trunk in patients with an aortopulmonary window

2000 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 674-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques A.M van Son ◽  
Jörg Hambsch ◽  
Friedrich W Mohr
2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Marini ◽  
Gaetana Ferraro ◽  
Gabriella Agnoletti

AbstractWe present the case of a 15-year-old boy who underwent arterial switch operation due to transposition of the great arteries with severe scoliosis, obstruction of the right coronary ostium, and severe stenosis of the pulmonary trunk. Balloon angioplasty caused a large aortopulmonary shunt provoking myocardial ischaemia and pulmonary hypertension. The traumatic “aortopulmonary window” was percutaneously occluded using an Amplatzer Septal Occluder device as a bridge to surgical repair.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 594-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austine K. Siomos ◽  
Max B. Mitchell ◽  
Brian M. Fonseca

AbstractThe window duct is a rare congenital anomaly that is physiologically similar to an aortopulmonary window but is extrapericardial at the distal pulmonary trunk. The diagnosis is challenging, and surgical management is complex. Our patient is the first and the youngest to be reported with successful closure and diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Murat Kose ◽  
Serra Ucar ◽  
Samim Emet ◽  
Timur Selcuk Akpinar ◽  
Kıvanc Yalin

The aortopulmonary window (APW) is an abnormal communication between the ascending aorta and the pulmonary trunk in the presence of two separate semilunar valves. It is a rare congenital malformation which represents 0.1% of all congenital cardiac diseases. Herein, we report a very rare case of 27-year-old patient with unrepaired APW causing Eisenmenger syndrome and pulmonary hypertension who was asymptomatic until her first pregnancy. The median survival of uncorrected APW is 33 years. Aortopulmonary window is a very rare congenital anomaly. To our knowledge, asymptomatic adult case has not been reported until now. APW should be considered in the differential diagnosis of the severe pulmonary hypertension also in adult patients.


2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 506-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Mert ◽  
Tufan Paker ◽  
Atif Akcevin ◽  
Gurkan Cetin ◽  
Ahmet Ozkara ◽  
...  

The aortopulmonary window is a communication between the ascending aorta and the pulmonary trunk in the presence of two separate arterial valves. This uncommon congenital anomaly is reported rarely in the literature. We present here our experience with 16 patients, emphasizing the importance of early closure of the defect by a transaortic approach.We performed surgery on 16 patients over a period of 13 years using a transaortic approach under cardiopulmonary bypass. The median age of the patients at the time of operation was 6.5 months, with a range from 1 month to 11 years. Preoperative pulmonary arterial systolic pressure ranged from 30 to 100 mmHg. Associated cardiac anomalies were present in 7 of the patients, and were repaired at the same stage. The defect was between the ascending aorta and the proximal pulmonary trunk in 13 patients, and between the ascending aorta and the distal pulmonary trunk, with overriding of the orifice of the right pulmonary artery, in 3 patients. For closure, we used a patch of 0.4 mm Gore-Tex in 11, and gluteraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium in 5 of the patients.One patient died during surgery. The mean follow-up period for the surviving 15 patients was 52.2 months, with a range from 12 to 130 months. All the patients were in good condition during the follow-up, and no residual defects have been detected.Aortopulmonary window is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly, which can be repaired with very good operative results if surgery is performed before the development of irreversible pulmonary hypertension. We advise early correction of the defect with a transaortic patch, repairing all associated cardiac anomalies at the time of diagnosis.


1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siew Yen Ho ◽  
Leon M. Gerlis ◽  
Christine Anderson ◽  
William A. Devine ◽  
Audrey Smith

AbstractWe examined 25 heart specimens with aortopulmonary windows in order to review the variety of the lesion and its associated malformations. Unlike common arterial trunk, the aortopulmonary window involves a deficiency of the wall of the ascending aorta and that of the pulmonary trunk. The window was in proximal position in three specimens, intermediate position in three specimens, distal position in 16 specimens and was confluent in three specimens. The size of the window varied from 27 to 100% of the total length of the pulmonary trunk but size did not bear any apparent relationship to the position of the defect. The shape of the window was tunnel-like in one case. Of the 16 specimens with distal windows, the orifice of the right pulmonary artery arose from the aorta in seven specimens and was overriding the plane of the window in one specimen. The window occurred as an isolated lesion in four specimens. It was associated with interruption of the aortic arch at the isthmus in eight specimens and between the left carotid and left subclavian arteries in three specimens. A further three specimens had isthmal stenosis. Among the other associated defects were complete transposition (two specimens), tetralogy of Fallot (one specimen), and double outlet right ventricle (one specimen). A ventricular septal defect was present in six of the 25 specimens. The associated lesions found with aortopulmonary window are seldom encountered with common arterial trunk, suggesting these two arterial lesions have different pathogenesis and are not variants of the same entity.


2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
MR Hoque ◽  
MA Hossain ◽  
Z Rahman ◽  
SMG Saklayen

Author(s):  
Davide Campobasso ◽  
Cristian Fiori ◽  
Daniele Amparore ◽  
Enrico Checcucci ◽  
Diletta Garrou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai Jiang ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Rui-Ying Zhang ◽  
Qiu-Jian Zheng ◽  
Meng-Yuan Li

Abstract Background Strength recovery of injured knee is an important parameter for patients who want to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Comparison of muscle strength between anatomical and non-anatomical ACLR has not been reported. Purpose To evaluate the difference between anatomical and non-anatomical single-bundle ACLR in hamstring and quadriceps strength and clinical outcomes. Methods Patients received unilateral primary single-bundle hamstring ACLR between January 2017 to January 2018 were recruited in this study. Patients were divided into anatomical reconstruction group (AR group) and non-anatomical reconstruction group (NAR group) according to femoral tunnel aperture position. The hamstring and quadriceps isokinetic strength including peak extension torque, peak flexion torque and H/Q ratio were measured at an angular velocity of 180°/s and 60°/s using an isokinetic dynamometer. The isometric extension and flexion torques were also measured. Hamstring and quadriceps strength were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Knee stability including Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 measurement and subjective knee function including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores were evaluated during the follow-up. Results Seventy-two patients with an average follow-up of 30.4 months (range, 24–35 months) were included in this study. Thirty-three were in AR group and 39 in NAR group. The peak knee flexion torque was significant higher in AR group at 180°/s and 60°/s (P < 0.05 for both velocity) at 6 months postoperatively and showed no difference between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively. The isometric knee extension torque was significant higher in AR group at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05) and showed no difference between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively. No significant differences between AR group and NAR group were found regarding knee stability and subjective knee function evaluations at follow-up. Conclusions Compared with non-anatomical ACLR, anatomical ACLR showed a better recovery of hamstring and quadriceps strength at 6 months postoperatively. However, the discrepancy on hamstring and quadriceps strength between the two groups vanished at 1 year postoperatively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document