A five year review of islanded distally based fasciocutaneous flaps on the lower limb

1997 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 421-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.W.H. Erdmann ◽  
C.M. Court-Brown ◽  
A.A. Quaba
1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 343-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey G. Hallock

Skin loss about the foot and ankle is notorious for creating a difficult challenge for limb salvage. Local tissue rearrangements rarely prove satisfactory, so a free flap as a solution can be readily justified. Distally based flaps utilizing unviolated ipsilateral proximal lower limb donor territories offer new possibilities in lieu of the complexity of microsurgery. Yet some unique disadvantages must be acknowledged particularly for island flaps, depending on retrograde circulation via major collateral source vessels, where venous congestion can occur and risk of limb devascularization may be unacceptable. Antegrade perfused, distally based flaps nourished by a single septocutaneous perforator or communicating branches may be more reliable options. This introduction to these three potential types of distally based lower extremity flaps is intended to promote this concept with appropriate reservations as another relatively simple alternative for wound coverage in the lower extremity.


2019 ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Hong Phuc Le ◽  
Thiet Son Tran ◽  
Nghi Thanh Nhan Le

Introduction: Anterolateral thigh flap is one of the most researched and widely used perforator flaps in the recent decades in plastic surgery as a whole and in limb reconstruction, especially in cases with complex deflects, in particular. This report aimed to evaluate anterolateral thigh flap in reconstruction of complex lower limb soft tissue defects. Subjects and methods: From August 2014 to August 2015, at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, 12 cases with complex soft tissue defects in lower limb were reconstructed and covered with ALT flaps: two distal based pedicle ALT flaps for popliteal and around knee joint defects and 10 composite ALT free flaps for lower leg reconstruction. Results: Twelve flaps used included: two peripheral pedicled fasciocutaneous flaps, ten complex free flaps (01 complex myo-fasciocutaneous flap providing muscle for deep space filled, fascial for tendon reconstruction and surface covering of the defect; 05 vastus lareralis myocutaneous flaps providing muscle for dead space filling and covering; 04 fasciocutaneous flaps involving the fascia lata for fascial reconstruction and covering). The size of flaps ranged from 8 to 27cm in length and from 6 to 13cm in width. The largest flap was 240cm2,the smallest was 50cm2. All 12 flaps survived. Short-term results at one month after surgery were consideredas good in eleven patients and fair in one patient. There were no special complications at donor sites. Paresthesia at the donor site was noted in two cases. Conclusion: ALT flap with its versatility as peripheral pedicled flap or free flap can be used in lower limb reconstruction with high success rate of 100% (12/12). Preoperative skin perforator mapping by Doppler was highly accurate (12/12) compared with intraoperative findings. Complex free ALT flap is suitable for reconstruction of major defects involving different type of tissue in lower limb with satisfied results. Key words: Anterolateral thigh flap, limb, ower limb


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document