Impact of bacillus clausii supplementation on anti Helicobacter pylori therapy related side effects: A randomized double blind placebo controlled study

2003 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. A361
Author(s):  
Enrico C. Nista ◽  
Immacolata A. Cazzato ◽  
Marcello Candelli ◽  
Francesco Franceshi ◽  
Lucia Fini ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Kaveh Alavi ◽  
Elham Shirazi ◽  
Maryam Akbari ◽  
Zahra Shahrivar ◽  
Fatemeh-Sadat Noori ◽  
...  

Background: Stimulants are highly effective in controlling symptoms of Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but 30% of individuals with ADHD do not respond to them or cannot tolerate their side effects; thus, alternative treatment approaches need to be considered. Objectives: To evaluate the effect and safety of piracetam as an adjuvant therapy plus methylphenidate (MPH) in children with ADHD. Methods: Thirty-six children with ADHD (6-16 years old), admitted to three academic outpatient child psychiatric clinics in the second half of 2015, were randomly assigned to the “methylphenidate plus piracetam group” and the “methylphenidate plus placebo” group, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, for 6 weeks. The “Conner’s Parents’ Rating Scale-Revised (CPRS-R), Children Symptom Inventory-4 (CSI-4), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I), and Children’ Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) were completed at baseline and at the ends of the third and the sixth week, and the New York State Psychiatric Institute side effect forms were completed weekly, as outcome measures. Results: The level of improvement in CPRS-R, CSI-4, and CGI-I scales were significantly higher in the “methylphenidate plus piracetam” group compared with the “methylphenidate plus placebo” group. Side effects were not remarkable in any group. Conclusions: Piracetam as a short-term adjuvant treatment to methylphenidate can have considerable therapeutic effect and safety profile in children with ADHD and deserves further exploration to assess its potentialities in ADHD treatment.


2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo Antonio Baltieri ◽  
Arthur Guerra de Andrade

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and security of acamprosate in the treatment of 75 men, aged 18 to 59 years, with diagnosis of alcohol dependence according to the ICD-10. METHODS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 24-week long. After a one-week detoxification period, patients were randomly divided in two groups: the first group received acamprosate (six tablets of 333 mg/d for 12 weeks) and the second group received placebo (six tablets for 12 weeks). After the first 12 weeks, patients continued the follow-up for further 12 weeks without medication. RESULTS: Patients who were receiving acamprosate showed significantly higher continuous abstinence time within the 24 weeks of treatment compared with patients who were assigned to placebo treatment (p=.017). Twenty-five percent of patients who were receiving acamprosate and 20% of the placebo-treated patients dropped out. Few side-effects were reported in both groups. CONCLUSION: Acamprosate proved to be safe and effective in treating alcohol-dependent patients and to maintain the abstinence during 24 weeks.


Cephalalgia ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisham K Al-Qassab ◽  
Leslie J Findley

Thirty patients with severe classical and common migraine participated in a double-blind placebo-con-trolled cross-over study of migraine prophylaxis with propranolol LA (long-acting) 80 mg once daily, or propranolol LA 160 mg once daily or placebo. Each treatment was given for two months. There were no significant differences between the three treatment periods in headache frequency, headache severity, nausea frequency or severity. There was a non-significant trend for reduced duration of headache with the two doses of propranolol. The possible reasons for this negative effect are discussed. The safety of propranolol and its lack of serious side effects were demonstrated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document