Abstract
Background
Patients with Crohn disease (CD) often develop strictures that require surgery. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is an alternative treatment that can be safe and effective. The objective of this study was to assess factors associated with the need for repeat EBD and surgery after initial EBD for stricturing CD.
Methods
Patients with stricturing CD who underwent EBD from 2007 to 2017 were identified. Demographic and clinical information was obtained from the electronic medical record. A Cox proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for variables associated with repeat EBD and surgical resection.
Results
Ninety-nine patients underwent a total of 240 EBD proedures; 35% had a history of perianal disease, and 63% were on a biologic at the time of initial EBD. Fifty-one percent of patients had obstructive symptoms at the time of initial EBD, and 75% of the EBDs were successful. Complications occurred in 8 EBDs (3.3%). Repeat intervention after EBD was more likely in patients on biologics at baseline EBD (76% vs 54%; P = 0.029). Thirty-three percent of patients had surgical resection at a median of 5 months (interquartile ratio = 2.0-13.0 months) after initial EBD. The presence of obstructive symptoms at the time of EBD was associated with surgical resection (hazard ratio = 3.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-7.86). Conversely, a history of perianal disease was negatively associated with surgical resection (hazard ratio = 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.68).
Conclusions
Patients on biologic treatment at the time of EBD are more likely to need an intervention in the future. Patients with obstructive symptoms at the time of initial EBD and those without a history of perianal involvement are more likely to undergo surgical intervention.
Outcomes of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation vs Surgical Resection for Primary Ileocolic Strictures in Patients With Crohn’s Disease
