Outcomes and Loop Pattern Analysis of a Road-Map Technique for ERCP with Side-Viewing Duodenoscope in Patients with Billroth II Gastrectomy (with Video)

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients who have undergone a Billroth II gastrectomy is a major challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the road-map technique for duodenal intubation using a side-viewing duodenoscope for ERCP in Billroth II gastrectomy patients with naïve papilla, and to analyze the formation and release patterns of common bowel loops that occur when the duodenoscope navigates the afferent limb. The duodenoscopy approach success rate was 85.8% (97/113). In successful duodenoscopy approach patients, there were five bowel looping patterns that occurred when the preceding catheter-connected duodenoscope was advanced into the duodenum: (1) reverse ɣ-loop (29.9%), (2) fixed reverse ɣ-loop (5.2%), (3) simple U-loop (22.7%), (4) N-loop (28.9%), and (5) reverse alpha loop (13.4%). The duodenoscopy cannulation and duodenoscopy therapeutic success rates were 81.4% (92/113) and 80.5% (91/113), respectively, while the overall cannulation and therapeutic success rates were 92.0% (104/113) and 87.6% (99/113), respectively. Bowel perforation occurred in three patients (2.7%). The road-map technique may benefit duodenoscope-based ERCP in Billroth II gastrectomy patients by minimizing the tangential axis alignment between the duodenoscopic tip and driving of the afferent limb, and by predicting and counteracting bowel loops that occur when the duodenoscope navigates the afferent limb.

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration as a Rescue Procedure for Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography: A Case Report

Across the world, choledocholithiasis is presently treated by a two staged approach of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio- Pancreatography (ERCP) followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC); in a vast majority of the situations. Modern day literature abounds with comparative outcomes studies between ERCP and Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE), as therapeutic modalities for Common Bile Duct (CBD) stones. There are strong arguments both in favour and against both these treatment options, in literature. As per literature, the advantage of LCBDE is that it is a single stage procedure, but requires advanced laparoscopic expertise and a choledochoscope in the setup. The advantage of ERCP is that it is a highly standardised procedure. In expert hands and well equipped setups, it rarely ever fails to deliver. However, ERCP is also a highly operator dependant procedure. Also, in the best of hands, sometimes, local factors such as abnormal anatomy, stone morphology can lead to failures or suboptimal results. As per literature, ERCP to extract CBD stones can fail for various reasons such as failed cannulation, previous Billroth II gastrectomy, large CBD stones, large number of CBD stones etc. The failure in retrieving CBD stones by ERCP is an absolute indication for performing CBDE. Here, authors present a case report of a 73-year-old male with failed ERCP (inspite of two attempts) due to a large, solitary but tightly impacted terminal CBD stone. It hopes to convey the message that in similar situations, LCBDE, tactically using some endoscopy accessories, is a sound backup therapeautic option, inspite of non availability of a choledochoscope in the setup. The novelty of this case was that instead of the standard use of choledochoscope to directly visually confirm the completeness of stone clearance during the LCBDE, intraoperative fluoroscopy has been used effectively for the same; by obtaining good quality proximal and distal occlusion cholangiograms at the end of the procedure.

Outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus primary LCBDE for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis

Objective This study was performed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) versus primary LCBDE for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 59 patients who underwent LCBDE during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis from January 2013 to August 2019. The patients underwent either primary LCBDE plus LC (Group I) or LCBDE plus LC after failed ERCP (Group II). The demographics, reason for ERCP failure, perioperative details, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Results CBD stone removal using preoperative ERCP failed in 31 patients (Group II) because of remaining stones after ERCP (n = 9), failed cannulation (n = 6), failed sedation (n = 6), a periampullary diverticulum (n = 5), previous Billroth II gastrectomy (n = 3), a huge stone (n = 1), and an impacted stone (n = 1). The CBD stone clearance rate was >96% in both groups. The mean operative time, hospital stay, overall complication rate, and open conversion rate were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions When extraction of CBD stones by ERCP is likely to be difficult or fail, primary LCBDE is an acceptable alternative treatment for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Reconstruction of the esophagus of patients with middle thoracic esophageal carcinoma using the remnant stomach following Billroth II gastrectomy

It seems impossible to reconstruct the esophagus of patients with middle thoracic esophageal carcinoma with a history of distal gastrectomy using the remnant stomach. Although surgeons have made multiple efforts to reconstruct the esophagus using the remnant stomach, it can only be successfully used in cases of lower thoracic esophageal cancer. Additionally, the surgery is more complex than traditional esophagogastrostomy due to challenges including mobilization of the remnant stomach with the spleen and transposition of the pancreatic tail into the left hemithorax. Our operation proved that the remnant stomach, which we named as the completely mobilized remnant stomach after dissection of the feeding vessels, remained viable. We successfully integrated the completely mobilized remnant stomach in the reconstruction of the lower thoracic esophageal tract and then integrated it in Ivor Lewis esophagogastrostomy. We describe this new alternative surgical technique for the treatment of middle thoracic esophageal carcinoma in patients with a history of distal gastrectomy in this study. Clinical data of 23 patients from 2008 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent the Ivor Lewis procedure. All remaining vessels of the remnant stomach were dissected at their origins, and Roux-en-Y reconstruction or Braun anastomosis was performed. After esophagectomy during right thoracotomy, anastomosis of the remnant stomach and esophagus was performed. Two-field lymph node dissections were performed. There was no case of necrosis of the remnant stomach or of perioperative death. Serious complications included anastomotic leak in three cases, afferent-efferent loop syndrome in one, and anastomotic stricture in two. Application of the completely mobilized remnant stomach in Ivor Lewis esophagogastrostomy is feasible, and the surgical procedure is similar to that of normal esophagogastrostomy.