Tu1616 - Standard Dose of Proton Pump Inhibitors Cannot Control Reflux Esophagitis Enough in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis Who have Absent Peristalsis and Weak Esophagogastric Junction Barrier Function

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-969
Author(s):  
Shiko Kuribayashi ◽  
Yasuyuki Shimoyama ◽  
Hiroko Hosaka ◽  
Sei-ichiro Motegi ◽  
Kenichiro Hara ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1569.2-1569
Author(s):  
A. Argibay ◽  
I. Novo ◽  
M. Ávila ◽  
P. Diéguez González ◽  
M. Estévez Gil ◽  
...  

Background:Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic, connective tissue disease with an autoimmune pattern characterized by inflammation, fibrosis and microcirculation changes leading to internal organs malfunctions. The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is affected in up to 90% of patients with SSc. Any part of the GIT from the mouth to the anus can be affected. There are few descriptive studies about SSc-related GIT involvement.Objectives:We aimed to characterize the GIT involvement in patients with SSc.Methods:This retrospective study included all patients from SSc cohort of our autoimmune diseases unit in a tertiary referral centre. All patients fulfilled SSc criteria proposed by the American College of Rheumatology. All subjects’ histories were evaluated. Laboratory and imaging results were obtained from the hospital files. Patients with digestive manifestations were compared with patients without GIT involvement. Chi2 and t-student were used, using the statistical package SPSS25.0.Results:83 subjects with SSc were included, 68 (81,9%) of them were women. The mean age at the onset of SSc was 62,1 ± 15,3 years (range 26-89) with a mean follow-up of 9,6 ± 7,4 years. 80,7% of patients had limited SSc, 12% diffuse SSc, 4.8% SSc sine scleroderma and 2,4% early SSc. Considering the immunological profile 12 (14,5%) had Scl70 antibodies, 49 (59%) anticentromere and 21 (25,3%) had ANA antibodies without specificity for anti-Scl70 or anticentromere. 37,3% patients had lung involvement, 20,5% scleroderma and 30,1% digital ulcers. 79,5% of SSc patients were treated with proton pump inhibitors or H2 blockers. 53 (63,9%) patients with SSc had GIT involvement. In 11 patients (20,7%) digestive involvement was diagnosed before SSc (mean 26,2 months). Esophageal involvement occurred in 83%, gastric involvement in 28,3%, intestine involvement in 24,5% and liver and biliary tree involvement in 26,4%. See table 1. No significant differences in age, sex, SSc subtype, autoantibody profile, lung involvement, skin disease, mortality and therapy were observed between patients with or without GIT manifestations. There were no deaths associated with GIT involvement. The most common pharmacologic therapy used was proton pump inhibitors (86,8%), domperidone (20,8%) and antibiotic rotation (17%).EsophagealGastricIntestinalLiver and biliary tree44/53 (83%)15/53 (28,3%)12/53 (24,5%)14/53 (26,4%)Esophageal motility disorder 8 (15,1%)Gastroparesis 6 (11,3%)Small bacterial overgrowth 7 (13,2%)Primary biliary cholangitis 9 (17%)Gastroesophageal reflux 40 (75,5%)Abdominal pain /nausea 10 (18,9%)Colonic inertia 1 (1,9%)Autoimmune hepatitis 3 (5,7%)Dysphagia 11 (20,8%)Subacute gastritis 7 (13,2%)Diarrhea 6 (11,3%)Cholestatic liver enzymes 11 (20,8%)Flatulence / abdominal discomfort 6 (11,3%)Cirrhosis 2 (3,8%)Conclusion:Almost two thirds of our cohort of SSc have symptomatic gastrointestinal disease. GIT manifestations are heterogeneous. Symptoms are non-specific and overlapping for a particular anatomical site. Esophagus is the most commonly affected. More than seventy-five per cent of patients experience symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. We did not find differences among patients with and without SSc GIT disease. 17% of patients had a Reynold’s syndrome.References:[1]Alastal Y et al. Gastrointestinal manifestations associated with systemic sclerosis: results from the nationwide inpatient simple. Ann Gastroenterol 2017; 30 (5): 1-6.[2]Savarino E et al. Gastrointestinal motility disorder assessment in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology. 2013; 52(6):1095–100.[3]Steen VD et al. Severe organ involvement in systemic sclerosis with diffuse scleroderma. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2000; 43(11):2437–44.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 205873842110303
Author(s):  
Wenwen Gao ◽  
Xiang Zhang ◽  
Yanhui Yin ◽  
Shuwen Yu ◽  
Lu Wang

The evidence on whether high-dose new generation proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) including rabeprazole and esomeprazole achieve a higher eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori has not been assessed. The primary comparison was eradication and adverse events (AEs) rate of standard (esomeprazole 20 mg bid, rabeprazole 10 mg bid) versus high-dose (esomeprazole 40 mg bid, rabeprazole 20 mg bid) PPIs. Sub-analyses were performed to evaluate the eradication rate between Asians and Caucasians, clarithromycin-resistance (CAM-R) strains, and clarithromycin-sensitivity (CAM-S) strains of different dose PPIs. We conducted a literature search for randomized controlled trials comparing high-with standard-dose esomeprazole and rabeprazole for H. pylori eradication and AEs. A total of 12 trials with 2237 patients were included. The eradication rate of high-dose PPIs was not significantly superior to standard-dose PPIs regimens: 85.3% versus 84.2%, OR 1.09 (0.86–1.37), P = 0.47. The high dose induced more AEs than those of the standard dose, but didn’t reach statistical significance (OR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.99–1.56, P = 0.06). Subgroup analysis showed that the difference in eradication rate of PPIs between high- and standard-dose groups were not statistically significant both in Asians (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.75–1.32, P = 0.97) and Caucasians (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.84–1.92, P = 0.26). Furthermore, there were similar eradication rates in CAM-S (OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.58–2.5; P = 0.63) and CAM-R strains (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.45–2.56; P = 0.87) between the standard-and high-dose groups. High and standard dosages of new generation of the PPIs showed similar H. pylori eradication rates and AEs as well as between Asian versus Caucasian populations, with or without clarithromycin-resistance. However, further studies are needed to confirm.


2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (14) ◽  
pp. 1338-1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie B. Dean ◽  
Reshmi M. Siddique ◽  
Beverly D. Yamashita ◽  
Ashoke S. Bhattacharjya ◽  
Joshua J. Ofman

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S469
Author(s):  
Kazuhide Higuchi ◽  
Toshiro Tango ◽  
Ataru Igarashi ◽  
Lida Teng ◽  
Yujiro Otsuka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document