Extending fixation beyond the working length of an intramedullary nail with a linked intramedullary and extramedullary fixation in complex femoral fractures; a brief series

Injury ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 719-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Venkateswaran ◽  
R.M. Smith
Injury ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 678-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuma Takashima ◽  
Ichiro Nakahara ◽  
Keisuke Uemura ◽  
Hidetoshi Hamada ◽  
Wataru Ando ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 105198
Author(s):  
Ching-Kong Chao ◽  
You-Lin Chen ◽  
Jian-Ming Wu ◽  
Chen-Huei Lin ◽  
Ting-Yu Chuang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richard C. Echem ◽  
Phillip D. Eyimina

Background: Removal of an intramedullary nail would require the extraction system of the inserted nail to be available. Sometimes the system is not available, and an alternative system would have to be utilised. Aim of the study was to document the removal of interlocked nails using bolts in the absence of appropriate fitting extraction system.Methods: A prospective study of consecutive patients seen by the authors between September 2016 and September 2018 in private clinics in Port Harcourt where the authors were invited to remove intramedullary nails. Bolts fitted to the proximal tips of the nails were utilized. With the aid of plier applied to the bolts and mallet, the nails were extracted. The patients’ socio-demographic and information relevant to the injury were obtained. Data was analysed using SPSS version 23.Results: Fifteen patients were seen. Ages ranged from 29 to 72 years, consisting of 10 males and five females. The tibia was affected in six and the femur in nine. There were five united tibial fractures and one non-united tibial fracture, six united femoral fractures and three non-united femoral fractures. Indication for removal was mostly patients’ request. Duration of surgery ranged from 1 to 4 hours. All the nails were extracted. Complications included broken nail, heterotopic calcification, bony overgrowth/ ingrowth/ongrowth around the nail and interlocking screws. There was no mortality.Conclusions: In the absence of conventional intramedullary nail extraction system, appropriate size bolts can be applied to the threaded proximal tip of nails and used for nail extraction.


Author(s):  
Martin F. Hoffmann ◽  
Justin D. Khoriaty ◽  
Debra L. Sietsema ◽  
Clifford B. Jones

Abstract Introduction The OTA/AO type 31 A3 intertrochanteric fracture has a transverse or reverse oblique fracture at the lesser trochanteric level, which accentuates the varus compressive stress in the region of the fracture and the implant. Intramedullary fixation using different types of nails is commonly preferred. The purpose of this study is to evaluate intertrochanteric femoral fractures with intramedullary nail treatment in regard to surgical procedure, complications, and clinical outcomes. Methods From one level 1 trauma center, 216 consecutive adult intertrochanteric femoral fractures (OTA/AO type 31 A3) were retrospectively identified with intramedullary nail fixation from 2004 through 2013. Of these, 193 patients (58.5% female) met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 70 years (range 19–96 years). Results Cephalomedullary nails were utilized in 176 and reconstruction nails in 17 patients. After the index procedure, 86% healed uneventfully. Nonunion development was observed in 6% and 5% had an unscheduled reoperation due to implant or fixation failure. Active smoking was reported in 16.6%. Current smokers had an increased nonunion risk compared to those who do not currently smoke (15.6% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.016). The femoral neck angle averaged 128.0° ± 5°. Fixation failure occurred in 11.1% of patients with a neck-shaft-angle < 125° compared to 2.6% (4/155) of patients with a neck-shaft angle ≥125° (p = 0.021). Patients treated with a reconstruction nail required a second surgical intervention in 23.5%, which was no different compared to 25.0% in the cephalomedullary group (p = 0.893). In the cephalomedullary group, 4.5% developed a nonunion compared to 23.5% in the reconstruction group (p = 0.002). Painful hardware led to hardware removal in 8.8%. All of them were treated with a cephalomedullary device (p = 0.180). During the last office visit, two-thirds of the patients reported no or only mild pain but most patients had reduced hip range of motion. Conclusion Intramedullary nailing is a reliable surgical technique when performed with adequate reduction. Varus reduction with a neck-shaft angle < 125° resulted in an increase in fixation failures. Patient and implant factors affected nonunion formation. Smoking increased nonunion formation. Utilization of a cephalomedullary device reduced the nonunion rate, but had higher rates of painful prominent hardware compared to reconstruction nailing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document