Assessing respiratory mechanics in obstructive diseases by forced oscillation technique: importance of expiratory flow-limitation (EFL)

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. S597
Author(s):  
R.L. Dellaca
2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.L. Dellacà ◽  
P. Santus ◽  
A. Aliverti ◽  
N. Stevenson ◽  
S. Centanni ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Mikamo ◽  
Toshihiro Shirai ◽  
Kazutaka Mori ◽  
Yuichiro Shishido ◽  
Takefumi Akita ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 1601270 ◽  
Author(s):  
András Lorx ◽  
Dorottya Czövek ◽  
Zoltán Gingl ◽  
Gergely Makan ◽  
Bence Radics ◽  
...  

Tracking of the within-breath changes of respiratory mechanics using the forced oscillation technique may provide outcomes that characterise the dynamic behaviour of the airways during normal breathing.We measured respiratory resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs) at 8 Hz in 55 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and 20 healthy controls, and evaluated Rrs and Xrs as functions of gas flow (V′) and volume (V) during normal breathing cycles. In 12 COPD patients, additional measurements were made at continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) levels of 4, 8, 14 and 20 hPa.The Rrs and Xrsversus V′ and V relationships displayed a variety of loop patterns, allowing characterisation of physiological and pathological processes. The main outcomes emerging from the within-breath analysis were the Xrsversus V loop area (AXV) quantifying expiratory flow limitation, and the tidal change in Xrs during inspiration (ΔXI) reflecting alteration in lung inhomogeneity in COPD. With increasing CPAP, AXV and ΔXI approached the normal ranges, although with a large variability between individuals, whereas mean Rrs remained unchanged.Within-breath tracking of Rrs and Xrs allows an improved assessment of expiratory flow limitation and functional inhomogeneity in COPD; thereby it may help identify the physiological phenotypes of COPD and determine the optimal level of respiratory support.


2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Dellaca ◽  
N. Duffy ◽  
P. P. Pompilio ◽  
A. Aliverti ◽  
N. G. Koulouris ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina S. Wilkie ◽  
Paolo B. Dominelli ◽  
Benjamin C. Sporer ◽  
Michael S. Koehle ◽  
A. William Sheel

In this study we tested the hypothesis that inspiring a low-density gas mixture (helium-oxygen; HeO2) would minimize mechanical ventilatory constraints and preferentially increase exercise performance in females relative to males. Trained male ( n = 11, 31 yr) and female ( n = 10, 26 yr) cyclists performed an incremental cycle test to exhaustion to determine maximal aerobic capacity (V̇o2max; male = 61, female = 56 ml·kg−1·min−1). A randomized, single-blinded crossover design was used for two experimental days where subjects completed a 5-km cycling time trial breathing humidified compressed room air or HeO2 (21% O2:balance He). Subjects were instrumented with an esophageal balloon for the assessment of respiratory mechanics. During the time trial, we assessed the ability of HeO2 to alleviate mechanical ventilatory constraints in three ways: 1) expiratory flow limitation, 2) utilization of ventilatory capacity, and 3) the work of breathing. We found that HeO2 significantly reduced the work of breathing, increased the size of the maximal flow-volume envelope, and reduced the fractional utilization of the maximal ventilatory capacity equally between men and women. The primary finding of this study was that inspiring HeO2 was associated with a statistically significant performance improvement of 0.7% (3.2 s) for males and 1.5% (8.1 s) for females ( P < 0.05); however, there were no sex differences with respect to improvement in time trial performance ( P > 0.05). Our results suggest that the extent of sex-based differences in airway anatomy, work of breathing, and expiratory flow limitation is not great enough to differentially affect whole body exercise performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document