EFFECTS OF SINGLE MUSCLE OR MUSCLE GROUP LENGTHENING ON MYOFASCIAL FORCE TRANSMISSION BETWEEN ADJACENT ANTAGONISTIC MUSCLES

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. S260
Author(s):  
H.J.M. Meijer ◽  
P.A. Huijing
2009 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 1453-1462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huub Maas ◽  
Peter A. Huijing

The goals of the present study were 1) to assess effects of antagonist coactivation on mechanical interactions between synergistic muscles, and 2) to quantify the extent of epimuscular myofascial force transmission between synergistic and antagonistic muscles in the rat forelimb. Connective tissues enveloping the muscle bellies in the antebrachium were left intact. Forces exerted at the distal tendons of flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), palmaris longus (PL), and extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) muscles were measured at various FCU lengths for two different stimulation protocols: 1) simultaneous stimulation of ulnar/median nerve complex (exciting all wrist flexors, including synergistic FCU and PL) and radial nerve (exciting all wrist extensors, including antagonistic ECU); and 2) stimulation of the ulnar/median nerve exclusively. PL and ECU were kept at a constant length. In addition, muscle forces were measured during stimulation of one of the indicated nerves, with later addition of stimulation of the second nerve during the maintained tetanic contraction. Coactivation of antagonistic muscles increased FCU isometric forces (on average, by 10% of optimal force) and PL forces (on average, by 13% of maximal force), but mechanical interaction between FCU and PL was unchanged. Changing the length and relative position of FCU significantly affected PL (by 20%) as well as ECU forces (by 8%). In addition, distal tetanic force of FCU kept at a constant high length was determined by the order of nerve stimulation onset. These results indicate effects of myofascial pathways between synergistic and antagonistic muscles in the rat forelimb. Coactivation may enhance the stiffness of connective tissues between muscles, but the present data suggest that activation of all wrist flexors already preloaded the myofascial pathways to the greatest extent. The stimulation order effects were explained by dynamic features of muscle and connective tissues (i.e., length-history dependence and viscoelasticity).


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 307
Author(s):  
Carla Stecco ◽  
Carmelo Pirri ◽  
Caterina Fede ◽  
Can A. Yucesoy ◽  
Raffaele De Caro ◽  
...  

Stretching exercises are integral part of the rehabilitation and sport. Despite this, the mechanism behind its proposed effect remains ambiguous. It is assumed that flexibility increases, e.g., action on muscle and tendon, respectively, but this is not always present in the stretching protocol of the exercises used. Recently, the fasciae have increased popularity and seems that they can have a role to define the flexibility and the perception of the limitation of the maximal range of motion (ROM). Deep fascia is also considered a key element to transmit load in parallel bypassing the joints, transmitting around 30% of the force generated during a muscular contraction. So, it seems impossible dividing the action of the muscles from the fasciae, but they have to be considered as a “myofascial unit”. The purpose of this manuscript is to evaluate the mechanical behavior of muscles, tendons, and fasciae to better understand how they can interact during passive stretching. Stress-strain values of muscle, tendon and fascia demonstrate that during passive stretching, the fascia is the first tissue that limit the elongation, suggesting that fascial tissue is probably the major target of static stretching. A better understanding of myofascial force transmission, and the study of the biomechanical behavior of fasciae, with also the thixotropic effect, can help to design a correct plan of stretching.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document