Endoscopic variceal ligation in the management of gastroesophageal varices in postoperative biliary atresia

1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1628-1632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sasaki ◽  
Toshimichi Hasegawa ◽  
Kiyokazu Nakajima ◽  
Hirofumi Tanano ◽  
Masafumi Wasa ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Oanez Ackermann ◽  
Paul de Boissieu ◽  
Olivier Bernard ◽  
Emmanuel Gonzalès ◽  
Emmanuel Jacquemin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Jianbo Wang ◽  
Shenghui Chen ◽  
Yehia M. Naga ◽  
Junwei Liu ◽  
Mugen Dai ◽  
...  

Currently, endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) monotherapy is the standard therapy for managing esophageal variceal hemorrhage. Patients generally need several sessions of endoscopy to achieve optimal variceal ablation, and the varices can recur afterward. Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) is an older technique, associated with certain complications. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of EVL alone versus combined EVL and EIS in the treatment of esophageal varices. This retrospective study included 84 patients, of which 40 patients were treated with EVL monotherapy and 44 patients were treated with combined EVL + EIS. The main outcomes were rebleeding rates, recurrence at six months, number of treatment sessions, length of hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, and procedural complications. At six months, the rebleeding rate and recurrence were significantly lower in the EVL + EIS group compared to the EVL group (2.3% versus 15.0%; and 9.1% versus 27.5%, respectively). The number of treatment sessions, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization were significantly lower in the EVL + EIS group compared to those in the EVL group (2.3 ± 0.6 versus 3.2 ± 0.8 times; 14.5 ± 3.4 versus 23.5 ± 5.9 days; and 23918.6 ± 4220.4 versus 26165.2 ± 4765.1 renminbi, respectively). Chest pain was significantly lower in the EVL + EIS group compared to that in the EVL group (15.9% versus 45.0%). There were no statistically significant differences in the presence of fever or esophageal stricture in both groups. In conclusion, combined EVL + EIS showed less rebleeding rates and recurrence at six months and less chest pain and was more cost effective compared to EVL alone in the treatment of gastroesophageal varices.


2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 931-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsubasa Takahashi ◽  
Hiroyuki Kobayashi ◽  
Ryohei Kuwatsuru ◽  
Geoffrey J. Lane ◽  
Atsuyuki Yamataka

2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 664-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Duché ◽  
Béatrice Ducot ◽  
Oanez Ackermann ◽  
Emmanuel Jacquemin ◽  
Olivier Bernard

2013 ◽  
Vol 145 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Duché ◽  
Béatrice Ducot ◽  
Oanez Ackermann ◽  
Catherine Baujard ◽  
Laurent Chevret ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-93
Author(s):  
Ajit Thapa ◽  
Dinesh Koirala ◽  
Rahul Pathak ◽  
Dinesh Chataut ◽  
Sashi Sharma ◽  
...  

Portal hypertension results in various complications, gastroesophageal varices being one of them. Although less common than esophageal varices, gastric varices are difficult to obliterate and carry a higher mortality rate when bleeding occurs. They are less amenable to sclerotherapy, endoscopic variceal ligation. Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (BRTO) has been developed as a minimal invasive procedure to obliterate gastric varices. BRTO is an endovascular procedure where a balloon catheter is inserted into a draining vein of gastric varix, and the sclerosant can be injected into the varices through the catheter during balloon occlusion. We report six cases where BRTO was done for gastric varices obliteration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Xuni He ◽  
Hanqing Chen ◽  
Mingming Zhang ◽  
Jiemin Hong ◽  
Peina Shi

Objective. Gastroesophageal varices are a direct consequence of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. The management of gastroesophageal varices has evolved over the last decade resulting in reduced mortality and morbidity rates. The study was aimed to analyze the short-term and long-term efficacy of different endoscopic methods in the treatment of gastric varices in cirrhotic patients. Methods. From January 2016 to December 2019, 135 patients with liver cirrhosis and gastric varices undergoing different endoscopic treatment protocols were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups according to endoscopic variceal ligation, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and a combination of both, respectively. Main outcomes including the overall response rate, hemostasis, short- and long-term rebleeding (3 months before and after treatment), complication, blood pressure, heart rate, portal venous pressure (PVP), portal vein diameter (PVD), portal vein velocity (PVV), portal vein blood flow (PVF) detected by ultrasound, recurrence rate, and mortality were analyzed after treatments. Results. The overall response rate in the combined group was higher than that in the ligation group and the sclerotherapy group ( P < 0.05 ). The incidence rate of complications in the combined group and the ligation group was lower than that in the sclerotherapy group ( P < 0.05 ). After treatment, the PVP, PVD, and PVF were reduced in the combined group compared with the ligation group and the sclerotherapy group, while the PVV was not ( P < 0.05 ). Lower rates of long-term rebleeding, recurrence, and mortality were noted in the combined group compared to the ligation group and the sclerotherapy group ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Endoscopic variceal ligation combined with endoscopic sclerotherapy is more effective than both alone in treating liver cirrhosis and gastric varices. The combined therapy contributed to reduced short-term and long-term rebleeding rate, decreased long-term recurrence rate, and mortality.


1966 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 791-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Shapiro
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
JHK Andruszkow ◽  
S Groos ◽  
C Klaus ◽  
U Schneider ◽  
C Petersen ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Rédei ◽  
M Szőnyi ◽  
A Zaja ◽  
L Tóth ◽  
Á Svejkovszky ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document