Successful repair of double-outlet right ventricle with transposition of the great arteries (aorta anterior and to the left), pulmonary stenosis, and subaortic ventricular septal defect

1972 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 741-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon K. Danielson ◽  
Donald G. Ritter ◽  
H. Neal Coleman ◽  
James W. DuShane
1995 ◽  
Vol 3 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 103-108
Author(s):  
KG Jaya Prasanna ◽  
Krishna Subramony Iyer ◽  
Rajesh Sharma ◽  
Balram Airan ◽  
Ivatury Mrityonjaya Rao ◽  
...  

From January 1991' to May 1994, 29 patients with double outlet right ventricle with ventricular septal defect, without pulmonary stenosis underwent primary intracardiac repair at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. Patients were classified into 4 groups based on location of the ventricular septal defect. The ventricular septal defect was subaortic in 11, subpulmonary in 13, doubly committed subarterial in 1, and noncommitted in 4 patients. Surgical treatment consisted of intraventricular routing of the left ventricle to the aorta (17), and the left ventricle to the pulmonary artery followed by an arterial switch operation (12). There were 4 (13.9%) early deaths. Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 3 years (mean, 1.5 years). There was no late mortality. Three patients had residual ventricular septal defect, one of whom has undergone reoperation. One patient has a gradient of 25 mmHg across the left ventricular outflow tract. Double outlet right ventricle with subpulmonic ventricular septal defect was found to be a significant risk factor for early mortality (p = 0.03). The subgroup of double outlet right ventricle with subpulmonic ventricular septal defect who had a combination of single coronary artery and post arterial switch operation was particularly prone to pulmonary hypertensive crisis and hospital death (p = 0.002).


2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Uemura ◽  
Toshikatsu Yagihara ◽  
Takayuki Kadohama ◽  
Youichi Kawahira ◽  
Yoshiro Yoshikawa

Objective: To investigate our surgical results of intraventricular rerouting in patients having double outlet right ventricle with doubly-committed ventricular septal defect. Methods: We undertook repair in 8 patients with this particular feature. Of these, 2 patients had pulmonary stenosis, and another had interruption of the aortic arch. The subarterial defect was unequivocally related to both the aortic and the pulmonary orifices in all, albeit slightly deviated towards the aortic orifice in one, and towards the pulmonary orifice in another. Intraventricular rerouting was carried out via incisions to the right atrium and the pulmonary trunk. To ensure reconstruction of an unobstructed pulmonary pathway, a limited right ventriculotomy was made in 5. Results: All patients survived the procedure, and are currently doing well, with follow-up of 25 to 194 months, with a mean of 117 ± 68 months. Catheterization carried out 16 ± 6 months after repair demonstrated excellent ventricular parameters. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure was 16 ± 7 mmHg, being higher than 20 mmHg in 2 patients. No significant obstruction was found between the right ventricle and the pulmonary arteries. A pressure gradient across the left ventricular outflow tract became significant in one patient in whom a small outlet septum was present, and a heart-shaped baffle had been used for intraventricular rerouting. Reoperation was eventually needed in this patient for treatment of the obstruction, which proved to be progressive. Conclusion: Precise recognition of the morphologic features is of paramount importance when choosing the optimal options for biventricular repair in patients with double outlet right ventricle and doubly-committed interventricular communication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document