RE: CLINICAL VALUE OF RENOVASCULAR RESISTIVE INDEX MEASUREMENT IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE OBSTRUCTIVE UROPATHY

1998 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 992-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferdinand Frauscher ◽  
Gunter Janetschek
1997 ◽  
Vol 157 (6) ◽  
pp. 2053-2055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Older ◽  
Howard L. Stoll ◽  
Reed A. Omary ◽  
Laurence R. Watson

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 3279-3284 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.P. Mwipatayi ◽  
A.E. Suthananthan ◽  
R. Daniel ◽  
M. Rahmatzadeh ◽  
S.D. Thomas ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A. SHOKEIR ◽  
A.P. PROVOOST ◽  
R.J.M. NIJMAN

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
A.R. Mehrsai ◽  
D. Mansoori ◽  
M. Taherimahmoudi ◽  
Danesh M. Rezaei ◽  
H. Wahhabaghai ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
pp. 1397-1404 ◽  
Author(s):  
YAZAN F. RAWASHDEH ◽  
JENS CHRISTIAN DJURHUUS ◽  
JENS MORTENSEN ◽  
ARNE H??RLYCK ◽  
JORGEN FROKIAER

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Esin Yencilek ◽  
Aysegul Sarsılmaz ◽  
Ozgur Kilickesmez ◽  
Hakan Koyuncu ◽  
Bilal Eryildirim ◽  
...  

Aims: To monitor the impact of Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) on the renal resisive index (RI) and to investigate the potential of the RI measurement for the estimation of the optimal duration between 2 SWL sessions. Material and methods: Thirty patients with single pelvis renalis stone were included. Participitants were grouped according to their age as group 1 (<40 years, mean age 36.2±3.9 years) and group 2 (≥40 years, mean age 55.4±6.5 years). RI measurement was performed in of all patients prior to SWL. After SWL, RI was monitored daily until RI returned to their pre-SWL values. Results: The mean stone size was 2 8.97±3.62 in group 1 and 10.08±4.67 mm in group 2 (p=0.077). Following SWL, the  RI value of both goups increased and the higher RI value was measured at the 24th hour as compared with their pre-SWL values (p<0.001). In day 2 RI of the groups declined, but the differences were still statistically different from their pre-SWL RI values (p<0.001). However, on the third day, RI of group 1 was close to their pre-SWL level (p=0.143). But, in group 2, RI value returned to their pre-SWL limits on day 4 (p=0.229). Conclusions: RI measurement gives important data regarding SWL related acute renal trauma and should be used as an US marker for recovery after SWL. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document