PREDICTION OF GLEASON SCORE UPGRADING IN LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCERS DIAGNOSED VIA MULTI (≥ 12)-CORE PROSTATE BIOPSY

2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (4) ◽  
pp. 713
Author(s):  
Sung Kyu Hong ◽  
Seung Tae Lee ◽  
Byung Kyu Han ◽  
Myung Kim ◽  
Sung-Soo Kim ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Kyu Hong ◽  
Byung Kyu Han ◽  
Seung Tae Lee ◽  
Sung Soo Kim ◽  
Kyung Eun Min ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Seung Chung ◽  
Byoung Kyu Han ◽  
Seong-Jin Jeong ◽  
Sung Kyu Hong ◽  
Seok-Soo Byun ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (4S) ◽  
pp. 55-56
Author(s):  
Sung Kyu Hong ◽  
Kyung Eun Min ◽  
Seung Tae Lee ◽  
Sung Jin Jeong ◽  
Seok-Soo Byun ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lluís Fumadó ◽  
Lluís Cecchini ◽  
Nuria Juanpere ◽  
Anna Ubré ◽  
Jose Antonio Lorente ◽  
...  

Introduction: To determine whether unilateral prostate cancer diagnosed at 12-core prostate biopsy harbours relevant prostate cancer foci in contralateral lobe in cases eligible for hemiablative focal therapy. Material and Methods: We analysed 112 radical prostatectomies of unilateral Gleason 6/7 prostate cancer based on prostate biopsy information. The presence of significant prostate cancer foci and/or the index lesion in the contralateral lobe is described. A subanalysis is performed in cases of Gleason score 6 and in cases of very-low-risk prostate cancer. Results: Contralateral prostate cancer was present in 69.6% of cases, fulfilling significant prostate cancer criteria in 33% and being the index lesion in 32%. No significant differences were found when analysing the Gleason 6 group (73% contralateral prostate cancer, 34% significant prostate cancer and 35% index lesion) or the very-low-risk prostate cancer group (80% contralateral prostate cancer, 29% significant prostate cancer and 45% index lesion). Conclusions: The assumption of unilateral prostate cancer based on 12-core template prostate biopsy information is unreliable. In about one third of the cases, there will be focus of significant prostate cancer or the index lesion in the contralateral lobe. This information should be taken into account when hemiablative focal therapies are considered.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 435-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish A. Vira ◽  
John E. Tomaszewski ◽  
Anthony V. D'Amico ◽  
Keith VanArsdalen ◽  
Alan J. Wein ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasmet Sarici ◽  
Onur Telli ◽  
Orhan Yigitbasi ◽  
Musa Ekici ◽  
Berat Cem Ozgur ◽  
...  

Introduction: The discrepancy between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason scores is common. We investigate the predictive value of prostate biopsy features for predicting Gleason score (GS) upgrading in patients with biopsy Gleason scores ≤6 who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Our aim was to determine predictors of GS upgrading and to offer guidance to clinicians in determining the therapeutic option.Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent RRP for clinically localized prostate cancer at 2 major centres between January 2007 and March 2013. All patients with either abnormal digital examination or elevated prostate-specific antigen at screening underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Variables were evaluated among the patients with and without GS upgrading. Our study limitations include its retrospective design, the fact that all subjects were Turkish and the fact that we had a small sample size.Results: In total, 321 men had GS ≤6 on prostate biopsy. Of these, 190 (59.2%) had GS ≤6 concordance and 131 (40.8%) had GS upgrading from ≤6 on biopsy to 7 or higher at the time of the prostatectomy. Independent predictors of pathological upgrading were prostate volume <40 cc (p < 0.001), maximum percent of cancer in any core (p = 0.011), and >1 core positive for cancer (p < 0.001).Conclusions: When obtaining an extended-core biopsy scheme, patients with small prostates (≤40 cc), greater than 1 core positive for cancer, and an increased burden of cancer are associated with increased risk of GS upgrading. Patients with GS ≤6 on biopsy with these pathological parameters should be carefully counselled on treatment decisions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Ferro ◽  
Gennaro Musi ◽  
Alessandro Serino ◽  
Gabriele Cozzi ◽  
Francesco Alessandro Mistretta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document