685: Financial Comparative Analysis of Cryosurgical Ablation of the Prostate and Surgical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Single Institutional Experience

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 222-222
Author(s):  
Vladimir Mouraviev ◽  
Israel Nosnik ◽  
Thomas J. Polascik
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Cryosurgical Ablation

scholarly journals The feasibility and safety of repeat cryosurgical ablation of localized prostate cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Mustafa ◽  
Scott Delacroix ◽  
John F. Ward ◽  
Louis Pisters
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cryosurgical Ablation

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of radical prostatectomy techniques using perineal or suprapubic approach in the treatment of localized prostate cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gelbert Luiz Chamon do Carmo Amorim ◽  
Geraldo Magela Gomes da Cruz ◽  
Denny Fabrício Magalhães Veloso ◽  
José David Kartabil ◽  
José Carlos Vieira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Lower Cost ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Perineal Approach ◽  
Surgical Site Complications

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the results of radical prostatectomy by perineal and suprapubic approaches as to operative time, procedure costs, and surgical site complications. Methods: The medical records of localized prostate cancer patients (PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml and Gleason score ≤ 6) were analyzed. Fifty-five patients were submitted to radical prostatectomy by perineal approach and 54 via suprapubic approach. Results: There were statistical differences between groups as to operative time (p < 0.05); for perineal approach it was in average 114 minutes (SD ± 0.03) and for suprapubic approach, an average of 167 minutes (SD ± 0.041). Prostatectomy via perineal approach resulted in 11 cases of surgical complications, and suprapubic approach, 3 cases. Conclusions: Radical prostatectomy via perineal approach took less time at a lower cost as compared to the suprapubic approach. However, there were more complications in patients submitted to perineal approach, mainly rectal lesions.

Financial Comparative Analysis of Minimally Invasive Surgery to Open Surgery for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience

Urology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Mouraviev ◽  
Israel Nosnik ◽  
Leon Sun ◽  
Cary N. Robertson ◽  
Philip Walther ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Single Institution

812 BRACHYTHERAPY WITH PD103 AND J125 FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFICACY AND MORBIDITY BETWEEN TWO ISOTOPES

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 225
Author(s):  
A. Ponholzer ◽  
R. Oismiiller ◽  
C. Somay ◽  
R. Hawliczek ◽  
M. Rauchenwald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer

scholarly journals Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Mono-institutional Experience

In Vivo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 306-313
Author(s):  
ALESSANDRO MAGLI ◽  
MARCO LORENZO BONÙ ◽  
FABRIZIO TONETTO ◽  
EUGENIA MORETTI ◽  
GIOACCHINO DE GIORGI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Stereotactic Radiotherapy ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Institutional Experience
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document