False positives and negatives in routine testing for drugs of abuse

The Lancet ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 345 (8963) ◽  
pp. 1510-1511
Author(s):  
A.R.W. Forrest
The Lancet ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 345 (8957) ◽  
pp. 1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
LidiaJ. Notarianni ◽  
Diane Belk ◽  
A.J. Collins

Author(s):  
Cheng-Yuan Ho ◽  
Ying-Dar Lin ◽  
Yuan-Cheng Lai ◽  
I-Wei Chen ◽  
Fu-Yu Wang ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 1241-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Velasco-García ◽  
Rocío Vargas-Martínez

Many of the functions fulfilled by proteins in the cell require specific protein–protein interactions (PPI). During the last decade, the use of high-throughput experimental technologies, primarily based on the yeast 2-hybrid system, generated extensive data currently located in public databases. This information has been used to build interaction networks for different species. Unfortunately, due to the nature of the yeast 2-hybrid system, these databases contain many false positives and negatives, thus they require purging. A method for confirming these PPI is to test them using a technique that operates in vivo and detects binary PPI. This article comprises an overview of the study of PPI and describes the main techniques that have been used to identify bacterial PPI, prioritizing those that can be used for their verification, and it also mentions a number of PPI that have been identified or confirmed using these methods.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 5738-5742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo B. Harrison ◽  
Pablo Saenz-Agudelo ◽  
Serge Planes ◽  
Geoffrey P. Jones ◽  
Michael L. Berumen

Yeast ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (14-15) ◽  
pp. 1097-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Alvaro ◽  
Ivana Sunjevaric ◽  
Robert J. D. Reid ◽  
Michael Lisby ◽  
David J. Stillman ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 332-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozgur Aydin ◽  
Hamit Yasar Ellidag ◽  
Esin Eren ◽  
Necat Yilmaz

SummaryBackground:Automated urine sediment analyzers have proven their feasibility in medical laboratories. However, editing manual microscopic review of some specimens severely limits the usefulness of such systems. This study aims to give feedback on the practical experience on »Yeast«, which is one of the parameters that compel frequent manual reviews.Methods: 5448 freshly collected urine specimens submitted from various departments of our hospital for diagnostic urinalysis were studied by the UriSed® (77 Elektronika, Hungary). A specialist medical doctor inspected every image onboard, and reviewed the ones with a »Yeast« alarm by traditional manual microscopy.Results: UriSed alarmed in 491 samples (9%) for yeast. In 59 samples (1%) the number of particles exceeded the cut-off and a »positive for yeast« was set. A false positive report of yeast +1 to 3+/HPF was found in 51 samples (0.9%). There were 8 cases with positive for yeast from both microscopic methods. Thirty-three »negative for yeast« samples were corrected as positive after the manual microscopic review.Conclusion: We report a high percentage of false positives and negatives in the yeast parameter, in line with other studies on UriSed as well as on other instruments in the market. As an important feedback, our observations showed that the major concern in false results was »the focusing problem«. We believe in the necessity of a focus check and comparison of alarms between images on board


2001 ◽  
Vol 123 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 119-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Romano ◽  
Nunziata Barbera ◽  
Isabella Lombardo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document