Role of a psychiatric outcome study in a large scale quality improvement project

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-243
Author(s):  
L.J Walter ◽  
C Schaefer ◽  
L Albright ◽  
S Parthasarathy ◽  
E.M Hunkeler ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. S621
Author(s):  
Briana Lewis ◽  
Judy Trieu ◽  
Mohammad Bilal ◽  
Eric Gou ◽  
Lindsay Sonstein ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Boardman ◽  
Martin Klein ◽  
Michael Saunders

Abstract Aim The role of the surgical Senior House Officer (SHO) is very variable and evidence reports that many surgical SHO posts do not meet national quality standards. SHO is an active training role in which the doctor should be exposed to all aspects of General Surgery to prepare them to become a registrar. However, in a busy surgical department this can be difficult to achieve whilst ensuring that acute inpatient care is not compromised. A quality improvement project was undertaken to increase the quality and quantity of training opportunities available for the surgical SHOs in a district general hospital. Methods All of the SHOs in the general surgery department were asked to complete a survey about their experiences as an SHO. A timetable with personalised allocations to on-call cover, theatre sessions, clinics and ward work was introduced. After one month, further survey data was collected to re-assess. Results Prior to the implementation of the new timetable, the SHOs did not understand their role within the department and had minimal exposure to the elective aspects of General Surgery. One month after implementation, job satisfaction was greatly increased and attendance in clinics and theatres had doubled. Conclusion The implementation of this timetable resulted in a significant improvement in training for the surgical SHOs and clarification of their role within the department. By specifying activities within a formal rota, overcrowding of SHOs in theatre sessions and clinics was avoided and it ensured that all SHOs were provided with equal and adequate training opportunities.


2013 ◽  
Vol 108 (12) ◽  
pp. 1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittny Neis ◽  
Doris Nguyen ◽  
Amindra Arora ◽  
Sunanda Kane

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e001045
Author(s):  
Nicola Thomas ◽  
Michael Nation ◽  
Lesley Woolnough ◽  
Hugh Gallagher

This quality improvement project aimed to drive large scale and sustained change to reduce the burden of chronic kidney disease in the UK. The intervention is a software program that extracts relevant biochemical data from laboratory databases which then generate graphs of estimated kidney function (eGFR) over time. Graphs showing progressive kidney disease are sent directly back to general practitioners (GPs) to alert them to rereview patient care and if necessary, refer to renal services. The aim of this evaluation study was to explain the barriers and drivers to implementation and adoption of the eGFR graph intervention. This evaluation study involved 5 of the 20 participating renal units (sites) . A developmental evaluation approach was used. Methods included collection of descriptive data about graph reporting; GP surveys (n=68); focus groups (n=4) with practices; face-to-face interviews with secondary care clinicians (n=10). Results showed the mean number of graphs reviewed per week per site was 230, taking 1 hour per week per site. Only 18.2% graphs highlighted a concerning decline in kidney function. Important enablers to sustain the intervention were low cost, easy to understand, a sense of local ownership and perceived impact. Barriers included nephrologists’ perceived increase in new referrals. We concluded that developmental evaluation can explain the barriers/drivers to implementation of a national quality improvement project that involves a variety of different stakeholders. The intervention has the potential to slow down progression of kidney disease due to the eGFR prompts alerting GPs to review the patient record and take action, such as reviewing medications and referring to renal teams if progressive kidney disease had not been identified previously.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1676-1683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay J. Talati ◽  
◽  
Theresa A. Scott ◽  
Brenda Barker ◽  
Peter H. Grubb

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document